The term “Motivation fee” can be interpreted in several ways. Motivation is the level of energy, commitment and creativity of the employees, which is only applicable in the employment. Different theories and methods have been found where the employees get the motivation in exchange of monitory satisfaction or related rewards. The Fee is defined as allowance, which employees get for their employment. Here according to the fact of the case, the motivation fee is was offered to the Minister of Energy of Vindalubia in order to facilitate the signature of the contract with the Government of Vindalubiais completely against of the employment ethics. The CEO has asked to pay the motivation fee, which is an illegal act. It is the act of bribery and a criminal offence according to the law of Saudi Arabia (Ferrell and Fraedrich 2015).

 According to the ethics of the company policies, this is an offence and not signified as motivation. It is bribery. According to the aspect of the legal term, the Saudi Law Article 10 has defined that the punishment for the briber and mediator or any similar offences is punishable under this relevant authority. If any person is found with such criminal assistance, then it will be compliance as a criminal offence. The person who will act this offence, then it will become perpetrated as a result of said agreement, incitement of assistance (Bailey and Burch 2016). 

According to the fact of the case, it is necessary to contact directly with the government for the clarification of such issues. The reason of the termination of the contract need to found and if there any contractual relation established while the contract has been signed. The contractual term of the contract also rectify the contract clauses here the rights have been claimed. While the inspection of the clauses, if there any disputes have been found then the management authorities must contact with an expert who will able to found the dispute and resolve the issues. The assistance the relevant authority is necessary to found and locate issues and advice accordingly. It should be proceed out of the court settlement, which must be less formal and aggressive than court proceedings. The expert should process with the court proceedings with extra attention, which will help to cover the technical assessment of the machinery or the procedure (Ferrell and Fraedrich 2015).

It must examine the quality of the product and apply the implication accordingly. However, the expert investigates the actual reason of such performance or the conformity, which is the actual cause of the delay and relevant performance. For such failure of the performance, it must assess the value of the share that are need to found. However, it always depends according to the approach by the parties toward the expert. The findings, decisions or recommendations always depend on the situation of the case. The experts are not bound with any enforceable decision because they the decision is only depend on the parties according to their disputes. Sometime, the disputes are solved through the proceeding in the court and assists by the judges or arbitral tribunals (Bailey and Burch 2016).

A being a chief of Corporate Control department, it is necessary to prepare for a designed program which will helps in the high compliance in the company with keeping into consideration that it is not enough about the changes which are required for the management authorities. According to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the commitment of the company only applicable when the business is conducted through the management program (Ford and Richardson 2013). It is consist of applicable laws, rules and regulations with the highest ethical standards. In a company, all of the employee, independent contractors, associates and director are bound to follow the rules. The company Whistleblower Policy is the part of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The suppliers and vendors are also bound to follow all the rules, which is abide by the codes. However, the code is not able to intend to cover all the policies or the laws, which are applicable in this code. If the code is not being followed, then the employees may face the consequence. Therefore, all of the employee and other relevant authorities must familiar with the codes. The managers are also bound to follow all of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the model of the ethical behavior. The company Whistleblower Policy is Part of the Code. The employee may raise the issue if the codes are not being followed (Ferrell and Fraedrich 2015).

Bibliography

Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Harker, M. and Brennan, R., 2015. Marketing: an introduction. Pearson Education.

Bailey, J. and Burch, M., 2016. Ethics for behavior analysts. Routledge.

Ferrell, O.C. and Fraedrich, J., 2015. Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases. Nelson Education.

Ford, R.C. and Richardson, W.D., 2013. Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. In Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (pp. 19-44). Springer Netherlands.

Grimmer, M. and Bingham, T., 2013. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), pp.1945-1953.