301181 Food Evaluation : Solution Essays

Question:

Laboratory report for Practical – Sensory evaluation and biscuit shelf life

Introduction

The introduction should state the problem and outline the method for tackling the problem. It should also include the background on the issues relevant to the experiment.

Your introduction should state the objective of using sensory and physical assessments to characterize biscuits produced with different types of fat ingredients to determine how the fat affects the quality and shelf-life.

Provide a brief review literature on the types of fat used in the biscuit trials and the likely changes during storage. Also review the methods employed during the experiment, including the training of a sensory panel; and qualitative sensory analysis. Also review the physical and chemical methods, including texture analysis, colour assessment, water activity and moisture.

Compare and contrast the different literature available to explain the relevant theories behind your experiments. The background information is included at this point so that you can refer to this theory or finding in your discussion, thus provide greater depth to your report.

Method

Provide a ’citation for the laboratory manual /practical notes provided for the experiment. Describe all deviations from the provided method; e.g. amounts, temperature, equipment changes, whatever is relevant to your particular experiment. Provide composition details on each fat used.

Results

Collate all the raw data (sensory results, texture, colour, water activity, total solids) into excel spreadsheets Place the excel spreadsheets containing all the raw data into the Appendix.  [This will allow me to check calculations and suggest how to correct if errors occur].

Extensive statistical analysis of the sensory data will be required:

  • Effect of fat on sensory quality for week 0 and for week 2, by ANOVA with Turkey Post Hoc test for significance.
  • Effect of storage time on sensory quality: Paired comparison test to identify significance change over the 2 weeks for each sensory parameter. Remember that you can only compare assessments for each individual.

The main body of the report will have the summary sensory results tables and graphs including statistical significance, plus tables and figures containing the physical and chemical test results for the different products, for week 0 and week 2.

Decide how you would like to present your results so they best illustrate the findings and allow the reader to easily compare and observe trends. You need to create your own tables that improve the accessibility of the information for the reader.  Always provide the appropriate SI units or metric units.

 

Answer:

Investigation of the effect of fat type on the quality and shelf life of biscuits

Introduction

This laboratory exercise aims to conduct a sensory training to develop the necessary skills to be able to characterize baked foods (especially) cereals according to their sensory qualities. The sensory skills developed will then be applied to investigate the shelf life of biscuits manufactured using various fat types to establish how the biscuit quality and shelf life are affected by the type of  fat used in the product. The different fat types to be investigated include vegetable oils, butter and coconut oil.   

Sensory analysis is a scientific procedure which can be applied to interpret the reaction of a particular subject to characteristics of substances such as food due to stimulation by smell, taste or touch (Obaroakpo, Iwanegbe, & Ojokoh 2017). In the case of food substances such as biscuits, the taste, smell and touch form the basis of sensory analysis. Obaroakpo, Iwanegbe, & Ojokoh (2017) characterized sensory evaluation as an integral part of product and quality control. According to Civille & Oftedal (2012), sensory analysis can be applied to study the shelf life of food substances and various sensory tests are applied in food-science research. Sensory analysis is a quantitative approach which involves the gathering of numerical data to establish the connection between human perception and the properties of products. The data produced from the use of human observers contains many variables and a sensory panel of trained inspectors for data generation is highly heterogeneous. Once data is gathered, appropriate methods of statistical analysis are used to establish whether the observed association between the properties of the product and the sensory responses represent actual unbiased responses and not just from uncontrolled variations (Chopra, Dhillon, Rani, & Singh, 2018). Thus sensory analysis should be designed to be precise and accurate to the highest degree possible to avoid false positive results.

A major ingredient of baked foods, fat gives baked foods important sensory characteristics. These include texture, odour, taste and colour. All these factors determine the level of consumer acceptance for a particular product. The shelf life of any consumer product is critical and is of interest to all the parties involved in the food chain, especially the producer and the consumer. The evaluation of the shelf-life of baked products such as biscuits incorporates well designed acceptability tests which involve sensory analysis. Food contents such as moisture and water vapour have a major impact on the shelf life of biscuits (Rigo et al., 2014).

According to Gebreselassie & Clifford (2016), fat is the principal component that gives biscuits their overall texture. Oxidation of fats is a major cause of the deterioration of food substances with high levels of fat. According to Caruso et al., (2016), the oxidation of lipids results in off-odour and off-flavour that compromise of the quality and acceptability of products. Besides, this effect affects the nutritional content of the food (Devi & Khatkar 2016). The modern food industry is driven by the goal to deliver satisfactory products to the consumers for a long time. Another major objective is to offer high sensory quality levels which is associated with fresh products (Mieszkowska & Marzec 2015). Baked foods such as biscuits exhibit a negative change during storage which involves the formation of unwanted substances such as aromatic compounds. According to Thomas (2018), the shelf life of a product can be defined as the time period during which small variations occur in a product without significantly lowering the acceptability and safety. According to Wirkowska-Wojdy?a, Bry?, Górska, & Ostrowska-Lig?za (2016), the low humidity in products such as cookies coupled with high fat content makes these products highly susceptible to fat oxidation.

Texture is a very important property of biscuits. The texture on the other hand is dependent on the cooking formula and cooking regime. The primary ingredients of biscuits include fat, sugar and soft wheat flour. Other minor ingredients such as milk, salt and flavouring agents are also present. The moisture content of biscuits is considerably low (about 1 to 5 %) (Rigo et al., 2014).  Different types of fat have different effects on the texture properties of biscuits. Fats can be sourced from animals or from vegetables and each type has distinct effects on the sensory properties of biscuits (Joseph 2016). That level of fat in a product also determines the sensory characteristics of the product. High fat levels raise the tenderness of cookies while low fat concentration produces biscuits of high breaking strength. Fat plays a critical role in the mechanical properties of baked products since it significantly reduces the size of the air cells in the structure greatly lowering the fracture stress of the product (Adeola & Ohizua 2018). Oils and fats influence the integrity of the structure of a product through interaction with other non-fat ingredients. Devi & Khatkar (2017) studied how oils and fats influence the shelf life and structural integrity of the final product. Fats and oils exhibit greater variations in composition compared to other biscuit ingredients. This is partly due to the fact that they are obtained from a large number of different plants and animals. The physiochemical properties of oils and fats are rather complicated. Each fat and oil type has a range of chemical, physical and compositional parameters (Gebreselassie & Clifford 2016).   

Fats have the function of dough shortening. This means that they have the ability to weaken and lubricate the structure of food products to yield a desired texture. Devi & Khatkar (2016) investigated the effect of fat types and fat quantity on the quality of produced biscuits. Their study revealed that biscuit thickness was considerably higher for biscuits produced using hydrogenated oil or fat while better surface properties and higher crispness was obtained with biscuits made through bakery shortening. Mamat & Hill (2012) investigated the effect of different fat types on the quality of cookies and the dough. They established that, the use of liquid oil in biscuits gave the final product a harder texture in contrast to hydrogenated and bakery fat. When considering the functionality of fats in the dough, the ratio of solid fat to the total fat is a crucial factor. This ratio is known as the solid fat index (SFI). The texture and functional performance of fats and products containing fat is determined by the SFI. Bakery fats such as butter and margarine

 

Method

Part A: sensory panel training

The sensory analysis was performed through qualitative description evaluation of the properties of the biscuits including colour, crispness, saltiness, sweetness, hardness, aroma, and acceptability.

Sensory panel trainings

A series of training exercises were carried out to familiarise with the connection between the intensity of the sensory attributes and the category rating.

Color

The sensory ability to associate color changes with certain properties of biscuits was inculcated through a review of a range of colours between extremely pale and extremely dark on a 15 cm rating scale. Some of the categories identified between the two extremes include slight, moderate, very slight, moderate-strong and threshold.

Taste

The sensory training for sweetness involved familiarisation with attributes of biscuits such as sweetness, saltiness, and sourness. Sensory training for sweetness included tasting a range of solutions between two extremes, not sweet and strongly sweet. Several solutions with different concentrations in terms of the mass of sugar dissolved in a litre of water were prepared. Each concentration was assigned a unique rating on the 15 cm line scale. A similar procedure was used to establish similar ratings for saltiness using solutions of different concentrations.

To establish the sensory scale for sourness, solutions with different concentrations of citric acid were used. The two extremes in this case were identified as the taste of a solution being sour and another solution of different concentration being strongly sour. Intermediate sensory attributes were given appropriate ratings. The sensory of bitterness was measured between two extremes ranging from not bitter to strongly bitter. Attributes between the two extremes were given appropriate ratings on the 15 cm scale.

Texture

The hardness of a food product was rated on a scale between two extremes ranging from extremely soft to extremely hard. The hardness of semisolid foods was measured through compression of a sample of the product between the tongue and the palate.

Part B: effects of different fat types

This part of the laboratory exercise involved applying the sensory skills generated during the panel training to characterize biscuits produced using different types of fats and to establish how these affect the quality and shelf life of the biscuits.

In this exercise, three different types of fats/oils were used. These include,

  1. Vegetable shortening
  2. Unsalted butter
  • Coconut oil

Three groups were formed each handling the production of biscuits using one of the above fat/oil types. The given formulation for the production of the biscuits in which the given proportions for the biscuit ingredients were used. The dough developed after mixing the ingredients in the appropriate proportions was then cut into portions of about 4.2 cm and baked in an oven a temperature of about  for about 10 minutes according to the directions given in the manual. The biscuits were then allowed to cool on trays.

Results and Discussion

Descriptive statistics

Average ratings and standard deviation

 

The figure above shows the average ratings and the standard deviations for the various sensory characteristics of biscuits.

 


ANOVA with Turkey Post Hoc test

Colour

Table 1: Analysis of variance for biscuit colour

SUMMARY

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

163

11

71.7

6.518182

9.163636

798

11

42.6

3.872727

5.670182

502

11

69.6

6.327273

6.588182

987

11

70.2

6.381818

5.451636

314

11

55.8

5.072727

2.738182

756

11

78.3

7.118182

11.89764

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

Between Groups

77.80364

5

15.56073

2.249231

Within Groups

415.0945

60

6.918242

 

Total

492.8982

65

 

 

 
Since the critical F value is greater than our F statistic, we conclude that there is no significant difference in the means. This means that there is no difference between the average colour ratings for week 0 and week 2.

Biscuit aroma

Table 2: Analysis of variance for biscuit aroma

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

73.3

6.663636

10.63455

 

 

798

11

80.9

7.354545

10.40473

 

 

502

11

91.5

8.318182

11.29364

 

 

987

11

58.3

5.3

10.11

 

 

314

11

73.9

6.718182

8.403636

 

 

756

11

99.4

9.036364

7.276545

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

96.47227

5

19.29445

1.991751

0.092788

2.36827

Within Groups

581.2309

60

9.687182

 

 

 

Total

677.7032

65

 

 

 

 

 

Since the critical F value is greater than our F statistic, we conclude that there is no significant difference in the means. This means that there is no change in the aroma of the biscuits for week 0 and week 2.

Rancidity aroma

Table 3: Analysis of variance for rancidity aroma

Anova: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

17.7

1.609091

2.786909

 

 

798

11

12.9

1.172727

1.304182

 

 

502

11

19

1.727273

2.646182

 

 

987

11

52.8

4.8

11.36

 

 

314

11

57

5.181818

16.83164

 

 

756

11

43.35

3.940909

10.90641

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

173.2274621

5

34.64549

4.535214

0.001423

2.36827

Within Groups

458.3531818

60

7.63922

 

 

 

Total

631.5806439

65

 

 

 

 

 

Since we have rejected the null hypothesis, we proceed to perform the Turkey Post Hoc test

Table 4: Turkey Post Hoc test for rancidity aroma

comparison

Abs difference

T

 

1 to 2

0.436363636

3.47

No significant difference

1 to 3

0.118181818

3.47

No significant difference

1 to 4

4.8

3.47

Means significantly different

1 to 5

3.572727273

3.47

Means significantly different

1 to 6

2.331818182

3.47

No significant difference

2 to 3

0.554545455

3.47

No significant difference

2 to 4

3.627272727

3.47

Means significantly different

2 to 5

4.009090909

3.47

Means significantly different

2 to 6

2.768181818

3.47

No significant difference

3 to 4

3.072727273

3.47

No significant difference

3 to 5

3.454545455

3.47

No significant difference

3 to 6

2.213636364

3.47

No significant difference

4 to 5

0.381818182

3.47

No significant difference

4 to 6

0.859090909

3.47

No significant difference

5 to 6

1.240909091

3.47

No significant difference

 

 

Hardness

Table 5: Analysis of variance for hardness

Anova: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

102.9

9.354545

2.592727

 

 

798

11

87.8

7.981818

5.649636

 

 

502

11

113.9

10.35455

2.420727

 

 

987

11

79.9

7.263636

5.636545

 

 

314

11

73.1

6.645455

7.398727

 

 

756

11

101.5

9.227273

6.816182

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

109.2298

5

21.84597

4.295519

0.002092

2.36827

Within Groups

305.1455

60

5.085758

 

 

 

Total

414.3753

65

 

 

 

 

 

Since we have rejected the null hypothesis, we proceed to perform the Turkey Post Hoc test

 

Table 6: Turkey Post Hoc test for hardness

comparison

Abs difference

T

 

1 to 2

1.372727

2.83

No significant difference

1 to 3

1

2.83

No significant difference

1 to 4

2.090909

2.83

No significant difference

1 to 5

2.709091

2.83

No significant difference

1 to 6

0.127273

2.83

No significant difference

2 to 3

2.372727

2.83

No significant difference

2 to 4

0.718182

2.83

No significant difference

2 to 5

1.336364

2.83

No significant difference

2 to 6

1.245455

2.83

No significant difference

3 to 4

3.215818

2.83

Means significantly different

3 to 5

3.709091

2.83

Means significantly different

3 to 6

1.127273

2.83

No significant difference

4 to 5

0.618182

2.83

No significant difference

4 to 6

1.179636

2.83

No significant difference

5 to 6

2.581818

2.83

No significant difference

Crispness

Table 7: Analysis of variance for crispness

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

99.8

9.072727

5.460182

 

 

798

11

99.3

9.027273

7.872182

 

 

502

11

113.7

10.33636

6.888545

 

 

987

11

94.9

8.627273

5.042182

 

 

314

11

93.2

8.472727

4.590182

 

 

756

11

114.6

10.41818

5.589636

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

39.41712

5

7.883424

1.334556

0.262064

2.36827

Within Groups

354.4291

60

5.907152

 

 

 

Total

393.8462

65

 

 

 

 

Since the value of p is higher than the significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis hence the crispness for the three cookie types is the same and does not change significantly over the period of 2 weeks is the same.

Sweetness

Table 8: Analysis of variance for sweetness

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

85.1

7.736364

7.010545

 

 

798

11

90.3

8.209091

5.604909

 

 

502

11

82.3

7.481818

7.375636

 

 

987

11

70.4

6.4

6.438

 

 

314

11

90.75

8.25

8.5375

 

 

756

11

80.6

7.327273

8.418182

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

25.67473

5

5.134947

0.71015

0.618149

2.36827

Within Groups

433.8477

60

7.230795

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

459.5225

65

 

 

 

 

 

Since the value of p is higher than the significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis hence the sweetness of the three cookie types is the same and does not change significantly over the period of 2 weeks is the same.

 

Vanilla

Table 9: Analysis of variance for vanilla flavour

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

57.1

5.190909

11.64291

 

 

798

11

68.4

6.218182

12.05764

 

 

502

11

65.4

5.945455

9.966727

 

 

987

11

63.2

5.745455

8.764727

 

 

314

11

71.6

6.509091

14.36091

 

 

756

11

66.8

6.072727

10.43818

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

11.19348

5

2.238697

0.199791

0.961328

2.36827

Within Groups

672.3109

60

11.20518

 

 

 

Total

683.5044

65

 

 

 

 

Since the value of p is higher than the significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis hence the vanilla flavour for the three cookie types is the same and does not change significantly over the period of 2 weeks is the same.

Acceptability

Table 10: Analysis of variance for acceptability

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

163

11

117.9

10.71818

3.575636

 

 

798

11

117.1

10.64545

5.120727

 

 

502

11

108.8

9.890909

5.358909

 

 

987

11

104.5

9.5

3.082

 

 

314

11

95.4

8.672727

2.792182

 

 

756

11

112.7

10.24545

6.554727

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

32.98182

5

6.596364

1.494408

0.20515

2.36827

Within Groups

264.8418

60

4.41403

 

 

 

 
Since the value of p is higher than the significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the null hypothesis hence the acceptability for the three cookie types over the period of 2 weeks is the same.

Paired comparison statistical analysis

Colour

Table 11: Paired t-test for colour

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

 

 

week 0

week 2

 

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

6.52

6.381818

3.873

5.07

6.33

7.12

Variance

9.16

5.451636

5.67

2.74

6.59

11.9

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.27

 

0.272

 

0.6

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

0.14

 

-1.59

 

-0.93

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.45

 

0.071

 

0.19

 

t Critical one-tail

1.81

 

1.812

 

1.81

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.89

 

0.143

 

0.37

 

t Critical two-tail

2.23

 

2.228

 

2.23

 

 

The results show that there is a no significant change in the colour of the biscuits made through shortening at a significance level of 5 %. The critical t value is 1.81 which is greater than the t statistic of 0.14. A similar trend is obtained for the biscuits made using coconut oil and butter. Hence there is no significant change in the colour of the biscuits from week 0 to week 2.

Biscuit aroma

Table 12: Paired t-test for biscuit aroma

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

week 0

week 2

 

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

6.663636

5.3

7.354545

6.718182

8.318182

9.036364

Variance

10.63455

10.11

10.40473

8.403636

11.29364

7.276545

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.382295

 

0.704742

 

0.410058

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

1.263309

 

0.889618

 

-0.71379

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.117568

 

0.197284

 

0.245839

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.235137

 

0.394569

 

0.491678

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

The probability values are greater than the significance level which indicates that there is no significance change in the biscuit aroma in the period of two weeks.

Rancidity aroma

Table 13: Paired t-test for rancidity aroma

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

Week 0

Week 2

 

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

1.609091

4.8

1.172727

5.181818

1.727273

3.940909

Variance

2.786909

11.36

1.304182

16.83164

2.646182

10.90641

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.377844

 

0.624397

 

0.375317

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

-3.36438

 

-3.79364

 

-2.37949

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.003595

 

0.001761

 

0.019323

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.007189

 

0.003522

 

0.038646

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

 
In this case, the p value is less than the significance level. Therefore, we conclude that there is a significant change in the rancidity aroma of the biscuits made using all the three type of fats.

Hardness

Table 14: Paired t-test for biscuit hardnessr

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

9.354545

7.263636

7.981818

6.645455

10.35455

9.227273

Variance

2.592727

5.636545

5.649636

7.398727

2.420727

6.816182

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

-0.11505

 

-0.3785

 

0.015845

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

2.297726

 

1.046355

 

1.238824

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.022213

 

0.160015

 

0.12185

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.044426

 

0.32003

 

0.243701

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

 

The results indicate that there is a significant change in the hardness of the biscuits made through shortening since the p value is less than the significance level. However, the biscuits made using butter and coconut oil show no significant change in hardness as indicated by the p value that is greater than the p value.

Crispness

Table 15: Paired t-test for biscuit crispness

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

9.072727

8.627273

9.027273

8.472727

10.33636

10.41818

Variance

5.460182

5.042182

7.872182

4.590182

6.888545

5.589636

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.074103

 

0.660402

 

0.690111

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

0.473763

 

0.864835

 

-0.13717

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.322921

 

0.203698

 

0.44681

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.645843

 

0.407397

 

0.89362

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

The results indicate that there is no significant change in the crispness of the biscuits for all the three cases from week 0 to week 2.

Sweetness

Table 16: Paired t-test for biscuit sweetness

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

7.736364

6.4

8.209091

8.25

7.481818

7.327273

Variance

7.010545

6.438

5.604909

8.5375

7.375636

8.418182

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.309757

 

0.435128

 

0.506815

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

1.454434

 

-0.04761

 

0.18345

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.088242

 

0.481483

 

0.429056

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.176483

 

0.962967

 

0.858111

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

 

The p values for the three cases are greater than the significance level. This indicates that there is no significant change in the sweetness of the biscuits made from the three different fat types.  

Vanilla

Table 17: Paired t-test for vanilla flavour

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

5.190909

5.745455

6.218182

6.509091

5.945455

6.072727

Variance

11.64291

8.764727

12.05764

14.36091

9.966727

10.43818

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.426502

 

0.4637

 

0.510539

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

-0.53563

 

-0.25591

 

-0.13355

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.301962

 

0.401605

 

0.448204

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.603923

 

0.80321

 

0.896408

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

 

The p value is greater than the significance level for all the three cases. This indicates that there is no significant change in the vanilla flavour of the biscuits over the period of two weeks.

Acceptability

Table 18: Paired t-test for acceptability

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

 

 

 

 

163

987

798

314

502

756

Mean

10.71818

9.5

10.64545

8.672727

9.890909

10.24545

Variance

3.575636

3.082

5.120727

2.792182

5.358909

6.554727

Observations

11

11

11

11

11

11

Pearson Correlation

0.730799

 

0.04955

 

0.634321

 

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

 

0

 

0

 

df

10

 

10

 

10

 

t Stat

3.006722

 

2.383033

 

-0.56092

 

P(T<=t) one-tail

0.006596

 

0.019206

 

0.293599

 

t Critical one-tail

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

1.812461

 

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.013191

 

0.038413

 

0.587199

 

t Critical two-tail

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

2.228139

 

 

The p value for the biscuits made from butter and shortening is less than the significance level. This indicates that there is a decline in the acceptability of the biscuits from week 0 to week 2. However, the p value for the biscuits made using coconut oil is greater than the significance level. This shows that these biscuits have not changed significantly and can still be accepted.

The results clearly show the effect of different fat types on the sensory properties of biscuits. From the Anova test, we observe that properties of biscuits such as colour, crispness, sweetness have almost the same average rating which indicates the fat/oil type used in the baking of the biscuits has no significant effect on these properties. In addition, there is no significant change in these properties over the period of 2 weeks. On the other hand, properties such as the rancidity aroma and hardness of the biscuits change considerably among the three types of cookies. Besides, these properties also change over the two week period with the average rating declining in week 2.

Conclusion

The results show that the different types of fat used in this laboratory exercise do not have a significant effect on most of the sensory properties of biscuits. The only sensory properties affected significantly by the fat types are hardness and rancidity aroma. Most of the biscuit properties do not change in the two week period. The shelf life of the produced biscuit is considerably long as evidenced by the little change in most of the sensory properties.

 

 

References

Adeola, A. A., & Ohizua, E. R. (2018). Physical, chemical, and sensory properties of biscuits prepared from flour blends of unripe cooking banana, pigeon pea, and sweet potato. Food Science & Nutrition, 6(3), 532-540. doi:10.1002/fsn3.590

Caruso, M. C., Galgano, F., Colangelo, M. A., Condelli, N., Scarpa, T., Tolve, R., & Favati, F. (2016). Evaluation of the oxidative stability of bakery products by OXITEST method and sensory analysis. European Food Research and Technology, 243(7), 1183-1191. doi:10.1007/s00217-016-2831-9

CHOPRA, N., DHILLON, B., RANI, R., & SINGH, A. (2018). Physico-Nutritional and Sensory Properties of Cookies Formulated with Quinoa, Sweet Potato and Wheat Flour Blends. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 6(3), 798-806. doi:10.12944/crnfsj.6.3.22

Civille, G. V., & Oftedal, K. N. (2012). Sensory evaluation techniques — Make “good for you” taste “good”. Physiology & Behavior, 107(4), 598-605. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.015

Devi, A., & Khatkar, B. S. (2016). Physicochemical, rheological and functional properties of fats and oils in relation to cookie quality: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(10), 3633-3641. doi:10.1007/s13197-016-2355-0

Devi, A., & Khatkar, B. S. (2017). Effects of fatty acids composition and microstructure properties of fats and oils on textural properties of dough and cookie quality. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(1), 321-330. doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2942-8

Gebreselassie, E., & Clifford, H. (2016). Oxidative Stability and Shelf Life of Crackers, Cookies, and Biscuits. Oxidative Stability and Shelf Life of Foods Containing Oils and Fats, 461-478. doi:10.1016/b978-1-63067-056-6.00012-4

Joseph, P. (2016). Oxidative Stability and Shelf Life of Bulk Animal Fats and Poultry Fats. Oxidative Stability and Shelf Life of Foods Containing Oils and Fats, 233-249. doi:10.1016/b978-1-63067-056-6.00006-9

Mamat, H., & Hill, S. E. (2012). Effect of fat types on the structural and textural properties of dough and semi-sweet biscuit. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(9), 1998-2005. doi:10.1007/s13197-012-0708-x

Mieszkowska, A., & Marzec, A. (2015). Structure Analysis of Short-Dough Biscuits and Its Correlation with Sensory Discriminants. Journal of Texture Studies, 46(5), 313-320. doi:10.1111/jtxs.12130

Obaroakpo, J., Iwanegbe, I., & Ojokoh, A. (2017). The Functional and Sensory Evaluation of Biscuits Produced from Wheat, Defatted Soybean and Coconut Flour. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 23(6), 1-7. doi:10.9734/cjast/2017/30836

Rigo, M., Tozatti, P., Bezerra, J. R., Farinazzo, F., Santa, O. R., & Córdova, K. R. (2014). Chemical and sensory evaluation of formulations of biscuits with okara. Ambiência, 10(1). doi:10.5935/ambiencia.2014.01.12

Thomas, P. E. (2018). Physio-chemical and Sensory Properties of Biscuits Fortified with Carrot Powder. International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology, 8(2). doi:10.30954/2277-9396.02.2018.12

Wirkowska-Wojdy?a, M., Bry?, J., Górska, A., & Ostrowska-Lig?za, E. (2016). Effect of enzymatic interesterification on physiochemical and thermal properties of fat used in cookies. LWT, 74, 99-105. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2016.07.040

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Homework help cost calculator

600 words
We'll send you the complete homework by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 customer support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • 4 hour deadline
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 300 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?