• Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources. 
• Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
• Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

The Assignment:

• Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
• Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
• Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.

  NOTE:  For guidance on infographics, including how to create one in  PowerPoint, see “How to Make an Infographic in PowerPoint” presented in  the Resources.

• Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you  originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of  the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected,  and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to  incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses. 

  Excellent   Good   Fair   Poor       Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:

·   Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
·   Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.        
 Points Range:     32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.

The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing  informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader  as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.
     
 Points Range:     28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.

The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an  explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.
     
 Points Range:     25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing  informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the  nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.  

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing  informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the  nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.

Includes:  1 or fewer resources.
    ·   Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.        
 Points Range:     14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
     
 Points Range:     12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.
     
 Points Range:     11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.
    ·   Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the  Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use,  how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be  derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from  your colleagues’ replies.        
 Points Range:     32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The presentation clearly and  thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the  Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the  data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge  that could be derived from the data.
     
 Points Range:     28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The presentation includes the  hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum,  including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might  be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the  data.
     
 Points Range:     25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The presentation includes the  hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum,  including an examination of the data used, how the data might be  accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the  data that is vague or inaccurate.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The presentation includes the  hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum,  including an examination of the data used, how the data might be  accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the  data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
    Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs  make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically,  and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully  focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.        
 Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
     
 Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
     
 Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
    Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation        
 Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
     
 Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
     
 Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
    Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA  format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations,  page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and  reference list.        
 Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.
     
 Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
     
 Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
     
 Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
  

     Total Points: 100