How relevant is geographical context in explaining political outcomes?

Geography of a place largely affects the politics of that place. The geography and politics of a
place are intertwined because the images and their relationships of geography relate politic. A lot of
people are aware of the phrase, “law of land”, which to them means set of laws which apply to a certain
country or region. This notion similarly applies to the intentions of the framers that applied the same
phrase in the constitution of the United States in 1787. The ministers and leaders in the foreign countries
like various titles when it comes to speeches. Such titles are related to the politics and the geography of a
place. Some of the titles used in some places include ‘democracy’ and ‘peace’. In some places, there are
people who avoid such words in their speeches. Such geographical locations have political leaders that
prefer avoiding over-specific and precise titles like the ‘British foreign policy’.The history of human beings
is all about patterns of human that change.
In a place like the United States, approximately 60 percent of the people who live within certain
city limits of Enumclaw vote for Democratic while 40 percent vote Republican. Yet, if you go into
unincorporated King County, the numbers are almost exactly reversed. Why is that? This is how
geography affects political attitudes.
Have you ever looked at a map of red and blue states during presidential elections? Blue states
(Democratic) consistently hug the populous West Coast and the large urban areas of the Northeast while
the Red states (Republican) are consistently found in the agricultural Midwest and South.
Geography plays a big part in these political divisions as it has throughout American history. From our
nation’s birth there have been geographic/political divisions.
New England, home to hard, rocky soil and short growing seasons, helped to create people who were
interested in business and commerce; those people represented the first American political party, the
Federalists. They favored a strong central government with high tariffs on imports to protect infant
American industries.