Racial and ethnic minority and low-income students are underrepresented in gifted programs in the United States as compared to their white counterparts. As Grissom and Redding (2016) note, even among students with high standardized test scores, such students are less likely to be assigned gifted services. In light of this, we explore various factors that can contribute to the identification of this particular demographic as gifted achievers.
To identify gifted underachievers, it is important to measure the difference between their ability and performance. Performance can be measured using standardized tests and any resulting difference used to confirm underachievement. However, standardized tests are biased, lack validity, and unreliable. In light of this, we identify three factors that can help identify gifted underachievers from this particular demographic. Firstly, teachers should receive training in gifted education to enhance their effectiveness in identifying gifted students (Powell & Siegle, n.d). The teachers should also receive training multicultural education to improve their ability to identify and meet the needs of gifted underachievers from racial and ethnic minority and low-income learners. Secondly, it is important to consider and look beyond non-intellectual barriers to achievement (Derek, 2017). Issues such as social and environmental problems, cultural issues, psychological may affect the identification and placement of gifted learners from this particular demographic. The third factor is family involvement in the learning process. Parents for this particular group of learners may find it hard getting involved in their children education due to several factors. As Kerr (2009) notes, involving parents and extended family members can help identify children for gifted programs.
Identifying gifted underachievers among students from racial and ethnic minority and low-income groups can be a challenge. However, applying the above outline factors can help the process and ensure that gifted learners from this particular demographic are identified and referred to the gifted education programs.
References
Derek, C. (2017). Observation and analysis of three gifted underachievers in an underserved, urban high school setting. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 62-75.
Grissom, J. A., & Redding, C. (2016). Discretion and Disproportionality: Explaining the Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color in Gifted Programs. Aera Open, 2(1), 1-25.
Kerr, B. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Powell, T., Siegle, D. (n.d). Teacher Bias in Identifying Gifted and Talented Students. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (1990-2013). Retrieved from https://nrcgt.uconn.edu/newsletters/spring005/
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more