Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Assignment 2: Gene Technology
Due Week 8 and worth 120 points
Gene technology carries with it social and ethical implications—many of which engender personal views and discussion.
Select one (1) of the following biotechnology topics to write about:
Write a four to six 4 page paper on your chosen topic. Organize your paper into sections corresponding to the following requirements:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Click here to view the grading rubric.
[removed]
Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCI115-A2-1 1. Biological basis: Describe the technology. Discuss what it accomplishes. Elaborate on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Describe how exactly the technology works. Discuss the biological principles that underlie this technology. Weight: 25% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.99 (14.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely described the technology. Did not submit or incompletely discussed what it accomplishes. Did not submit or incompletely elaborated on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Did not submit or incompletely described how exactly the technology works. Did not submit or incompletely discussed the biological principles that underlie this technology.
|
Points Range:18 (15%) – 20.99 (17.49%)
Insufficiently described the technology. Insufficiently discussed what it accomplishes. Insufficiently elaborated on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Insufficiently described how exactly the technology works. Insufficiently discussed the biological principles that underlie this technology.
|
Points Range:21 (17.5%) – 23.99 (19.99%)
Partially described the technology. Partially discussed what it accomplishes. Partially elaborated on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Partially described how exactly the technology works. Partially discussed the biological principles that underlie this technology.
|
Points Range:24 (20%) – 26.99 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily described the technology. Satisfactorily discussed what it accomplishes. Satisfactorily elaborated on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Satisfactorily described how exactly the technology works. Satisfactorily discussed the biological principles that underlie this technology.
|
Points Range:27 (22.5%) – 30 (25%)
Thoroughly described the technology. Thoroughly discussed what it accomplishes. Thoroughly elaborated on the scientific principles that make this technology possible. Thoroughly described how exactly the technology works. Thoroughly discussed the biological principles that underlie this technology.
|
SCI115-A2-2 2. Social and ethical implications: Provide an analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. State the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Discuss the benefits and risks. Weight: 25% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.99 (14.99%)
Did not submit or provided an incomplete analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. Did not submit or incompletely stated the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Did not submit or incompletely discussed the benefits and risks.
|
Points Range:18 (15%) – 20.99 (17.49%)
Provided an insufficient analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. Insufficiently stated the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Insufficiently discussed the benefits and risks.
|
Points Range:21 (17.5%) – 23.99 (19.99%)
Provided a partial analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. Partially stated the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Partially discussed the benefits and risks.
|
Points Range:24 (20%) – 26.99 (22.49%)
Provided a satisfactory analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. Satisfactorily stated the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Satisfactorily discussed the benefits and risks.
|
Points Range:27 (22.5%) – 30 (25%)
Provided a thorough analysis of the technology’s social and ethical implications. Thoroughly stated the ethical concerns apparent in the use of this technology. Thoroughly discussed the benefits and risks.
|
SCI115-A2-3 3. Personal viewpoint: Give your personal opinion about the technology. Provide a justification of that opinion. Weight: 25% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.99 (14.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely gave your personal opinion about the technology. Did not submit or provided an incomplete justification of that opinion.
|
Points Range:18 (15%) – 20.99 (17.49%)
Insufficiently gave your personal opinion about the technology. Provided an insufficient justification of that opinion.
|
Points Range:21 (17.5%) – 23.99 (19.99%)
Partially gave your personal opinion about the technology. Provided a partial justification of that opinion.
|
Points Range:24 (20%) – 26.99 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily gave your personal opinion about the technology. Provided a satisfactory justification of that opinion.
|
Points Range:27 (22.5%) – 30 (25%)
Thoroughly gave your personal opinion about the technology. Provided a thorough justification of that opinion.
|
SCI115-A2-4 4. Writing / Support for ideas Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 3.59 (2.99%)
Never uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas
|
Points Range:3.6 (3%) – 4.19 (3.49%)
Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas
|
Points Range:4.2 (3.5%) – 4.79 (3.99%)
Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas
|
Points Range:4.8 (4%) – 5.39 (4.49%)
Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas
|
Points Range:5.4 (4.5%) – 6 (5%)
Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
SCI115-A2-5 5. Writing / Grammar and mechanics Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 3.59 (2.99%)
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
Points Range:3.6 (3%) – 4.19 (3.49%)
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
Points Range:4.2 (3.5%) – 4.79 (3.99%)
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
Points Range:4.8 (4%) – 5.39 (4.49%)
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
Points Range:5.4 (4.5%) – 6 (5%)
Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
SCI115-A2-6 6. Writing and Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 3.59 (2.99%)
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism or failure to use in-text citations.
|
Points Range:3.6 (3%) – 4.19 (3.49%)
Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations
|
Points Range:4.2 (3.5%) – 4.79 (3.99%)
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations
|
Points Range:4.8 (4%) – 5.39 (4.49%)
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations
|
Points Range:5.4 (4.5%) – 6 (5%)
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations
|
SCI115-A2-7 7. Information Literacy / Crediting Sources in APA Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 3.59 (2.99%)
Lack of citations and/or lack of reference section and/or citations don’t correspond to listed references
|
Points Range:3.6 (3%) – 4.19 (3.49%)
In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format
|
Points Range:4.2 (3.5%) – 4.79 (3.99%)
Partially shows correct (or approximately correct) use of in-text citations, with matching references using APA-format
|
Points Range:4.8 (4%) – 5.39 (4.49%)
Mostly shows correct use of in-text citations with matching references using APA-format
|
Points Range:5.4 (4.5%) – 6 (5%)
Consistently shows correct use of In-text citations with matching references using APA-format
|
SCI115-A2-8 8. Information Literacy / Research Weight: 5% |
Points Range:0 (0%) – 3.59 (2.99%)
Quantity and/or quality of sources are unacceptable
|
Points Range:3.6 (3%) – 4.19 (3.49%)
Too few references and/or references are of poor quality
|
Points Range:4.2 (3.5%) – 4.79 (3.99%)
Number of sources is less than expected and/or the quality of sources is questionable.
|
Points Range:4.8 (4%) – 5.39 (4.49%)
Number of sources is sufficient and the quality of sources is mostly good.
|
Points Range:5.4 (4.5%) – 6 (5%)
Number of sources is sufficient and the quality of sources is good.
|
4 years ago
35
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more