Euthanasia is known as the act of deliberately ending life, thereby, discharging a person from a hopeless illness or painful survival. It is frequently alluded as a simple and effortless death. Voluntary euthanasia is the ending of a patient’s life upon the request of the person or his attorney. Positive euthanasia is the act of taking deliberate action to cause the painless death. Failure to take action to prevent someone’s death is referred to as negative euthanasia. Euthanasia is still illegal in most states in the USA. Most people agree that euthanasia should be allowed in a free society. My opinion is that euthanasia should be allowed as it allows an individual to have a peaceful and painless death. It also relieves the family of the necessity to raise high amounts in hospital bills and provides a legal escape for those who have chosen to go that way sooner or later.
Patients of interminable diseases like cancer should be allowed to choose their time of death. This is on the grounds that cancer is the number one killer in the USA[i]. Cancer is associated with severe and intractable pain. This pain is unmanageable and should therefore be sufficient grounds for allowing one to choose their time of death. Patients with intractable cancer often get various side effects including exhaustion, anxiety, mental confusion, anxiety and nausea. Most of these side effects cannot be disposed of and may often influence the sense capacity and wellbeing. Allowing euthanasia is the solution to such pain as is experienced during the terminal stage of the diseases. I additionally concur that strict rules must be put into place to prevent misuse from families that may benefit from one’s death[ii].
Patients with interminable diseases are often very expensive to manage. While everyone knows that the patient will eventually die, it is unnecessary to allow the patient to continue to raise the economic burden for their families if they choose to terminate their lives. Those patients who have terminal illnesses have no hope of survival. Failure to allow them to choose their time of death prevents such families from surviving economically. Eventually, trying to sustain life a little longer may only be pushing it away for the rest of the family. If doctors cannot change one’s destiny which they are aware about, why assist in retention of life while they can end it and save the family a fortune?
Thirdly, terminally ill patients often go to great lengths to end their lives. Some patients seek for illegal medications that are certain to cause their deaths. Others may also opt to go on hunger strikes while others opt to stop taking their medications[iii]. All these are either very painful or expensive methods of terminating lives and should be allowed at any cost. Allowing euthanasia will allow patients to use legal methods of speeding up death when it cannot be avoided.
conclusion, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized for terminally ill
patients. This way, people who have terminal illnesses will have a chance at a
peaceful and painless death. Second, the legalization of euthanasia will allow
patients to die and leave their families economically stable. Thirdly, patients
with terminal illnesses often go to great lengths to end their lives. They
however only get access to expensive or more painful means of death. For this
reason, patients who have a sure death penalty issued by their illnesses should
be allowed an earlier death.
Bachman, Jerald G., Kirsten H. Alcser, David J. Doukas, Richard L. Lichtenstein, Amy D. Corning, and Howard Brody. “Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia.” New England Journal of Medicine 334, no. 5 (1996): 303-309.
Ferrand, Edouard, Eric Rondeau, François Lemaire, and Marc Fischler. “Requests for euthanasia and palliative care in France.” The Lancet 377, no. 9764 (2011): 467-468.
i Bachman, Jerald G., Kirsten H. Alcser, David J. Doukas, Richard L. Lichtenstein, Amy D. Corning, and Howard Brody. “Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia.” New England Journal of Medicine 334, no. 5 (1996): 306
ii Ferrand, Edouard, Eric Rondeau, François Lemaire, and Marc Fischler. “Requests for euthanasia and palliative care in France.” The Lancet 377, no. 9764 (2011): 467
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more