The title of the research paper is unclear or equivocal in that it does not specify vividly the relation between technology, Mathematics Educational Programs and Saudi Arabia. Given the content of the research, good examples of topics would have been “Use of technology in mathematics educational programs in Saudi Arabia high schools” or “Effectiveness of web-based social networking in mathematics educational programs in Saudi high schools.” These examples show the relation between technology, Mathematics Educational Programs and Saudi Arabia in the topic.
The abstract provides the basis for the research, that is, rationale or justification of the study. It also accurately describes the objectives of the research. However, the abstract is not intelligible in that it does not clearly highlight the research methodology utilized or state the results of the research and the conclusions arrived at by the author based on the findings.
The purpose is stated clearly, that is, determining the status of online networking used among mathematics teachers in the classroom, deciding their view of utilizing web-based social networking in instructing Saudi Arabia students at high school level and finding the distinctions among members’ reactions in light of sexual orientation, encounter, and the level at which they educate Saudi Arabia students at high school level. The purpose also connects with the main method of technology use in Saudi Arabia high schools, that is, Mathematic Educational programs through web-based social networking.
This section provides objectives of the Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) as a method utilized to assess the standard or prowess of instructors with the aim of determining the distinction and effectiveness of technology-based methods of teaching Mathematics in Saudi Arabia high schools. This information should have been part of the background for the purpose and objectives of this research in the introduction section since it is not coherent with the objectives of the study stated in the abstract section.
The introduction provides a good background or premise for the study by highlighting the need for teachers in Saudi Arabia to enhance their instruction in Mathematics so as to address the changes made by the Ministry of Education. However, it fails to include the basis or origin of the information of student mathematical learning that necessitates adjustment in form of using technological methods such as the Mathematics Educational Programs based on Teacher Performance Appraisal reports. This basis is included in the previous objectives section, but should be included in the introduction instead.
There is also observation of a pattern or correlation “From growing the quantity of foundations in the course of the most recent decade to certifying the most elevated number of understudies on grants crosswise over 75 nations abroad east and west all endeavors are gone for influencing training in Saudi Arabia world-to class.” Nonetheless, the introduction fails to provide a research hypothesis that provides an explanation for this pattern and determines the generalities of the pattern, as well as, a rationale and justification for the study, that is, why the research was undertaken. Moreover, there is no clear thesis statement that guides the trajectory of the research.
The review of literature is rich in research conducted by discordant scholars on technology-based learning. The section contains studies by different authors on various uses of technology in learning. There is also comparison of the purpose and effectiveness of technology based learning in distinct nations such as Saudi Arabia and the United States in the literature review. Given that the purpose of this research is determining the status of online networking used among mathematics teachers in the classroom, deciding their view of utilizing web-based social networking in instructing Saudi Arabia students at high school level and finding the distinctions among members’ reactions in light of sexual orientation, encounter, and the level at which they educate Saudi Arabia students at high school level, the literature review contains research that expounds on the effectiveness of sharing information through technology systems as a means of advancing learning and teaching mathematics through Mathematical Educational programs aided by web-based social networking techniques. It is vital to note that the literature review does not only dwell on the merits of technology-based learning but also highlights its demerits such as disqualification of instructors due to lack of proper training required to utilize technology in learning and teaching Mathematics
The research questions are clear in that they inform the reader of the aims of the study. However, there are errors in the numbering of the research questions, as well as, lack of descriptions of terms such as Tabuk that are not present in other sections of the research paper. In addition, certain statements that have been numbered are not questions and appear to have no causation, relation or association with the research questions. Thus, they are irrelevant in this section.
Performance between the students teaching
In this section, the author presents information that is equivalent of the research background and literature review. However, this background information and literature review which are outlined under a vague and illogical heading are not preceded by the research methodology for this study. The readers could get confused and perceive this section as the results of the study given that it appears after the literature review with no preceding research methodology.
ConclusionThe conclusion is a good summary of the other sections. However, it contains information that should have been included in sections that are omitted from this research such as the research methodology, results and discussion sections. For instance, it is stated in the conclusion that a survey was conducted while keeping in mind the end goal so as to gather data on mathematics teacher’s sentiments and observations. This data collection technique should have been included in the research methodology section lacking from this research together with the research design and data analysis outlined in this section. Finally, the conclusion also contains the results of the study; information that the author should have included in a separate results section after the research methodology. Notwithstanding, there is no discussion of the results so as to determine their significance and implication in accordance with the objectives of the research. This is another section that should have been included in the research paper prior to the conclusion.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more