FINAL EXAM ANWERS EACH QUESTION ONE PAGE LONG

  
1) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 7. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

  
2) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 8. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

  
3) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 9. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

  
4) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 10. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

  
5) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 11. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

  
6) PLEASE SELECT 1 (ONE) END OF CHAPTER QUESTION FROM CHAPTER 12. RESPOND TO THE QUESTION IN DEPTH OR YOU CAN SUMMARIZE THE CHAPTER. Choose a question that you did not choose throughout the term for the discussion Board questions. Apply them to your real life experiences, society or how you may act in that case. Please go in depth with responses.

SAMPLE RESPONSE 1
In Chapter 7, I would like to go over the 2nd question on page 377. Abrams asks us if were to represent Reid, would we have been willing to sign the requested affirmation as talked about in the case. Personally I would not have signed the affirmation either. Under the Special Administration Measures, (SAMs) ass it applies to this case would have made it possible for the Co-council or the other lawyers and attorneys to speak with Reid without Reid’s attorneys being present. Why would you as Reid’s defense allow this to happen willingly? 
This break in communication due to the SAMs between client and Attorney goes against the 6th Amendments right to council in a criminal case. So I believe they made the right choice by not signing and I would have done the same. To not allow Reid to consult with his attorneys truly is a violation on the proper way we perform defense for council. The attorneys are subordinate to the laws of the court in every aspect and must abide by them. They cannot begin to utilize procedure twisting it to compliment their agenda.
In chapter 8, Abrams asks the reader what the implications were to Judge Robertson’s conclusion on the issue of defendant’s access to classified information as affirmed in the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court. Basically Judge Robertson concluded that excluding the defendant from a hearing room when classified information or evidence that is being presented is a major flaw for the military commission because the defendant would not be informed of that information properly. The mere fact that Detailed Defense Council who did have security clearances that were eligible to be present and hear the information would not be enough to protect the defendant’s rights. Ultimately the government has a choice to make. If the Preceding military judge determines that alternatives may not be used and the government objects to disclosure of information, then by that time the conflict created by the need of the government to protect classified information and the defendant’s right to be present has no resolve. The only options left are to strike the testimony of a witness or declare a mistrial. If the evidence has no revalance or meaning to the defense then the charges must be dismissed. I honestly believe that this is a fair and honest approach to such a dilemma. 
References
Moscowitz, J.,  Tedlie, E., Elissa S. & Acree, M. (2008). Positive affect uniquely predicts 
lower risk of mortality in people with diabetes. Health Psychology, 27(1, Suppl), S73-S82.
Nunner-Winkler, G. (2007). Development of Moral Motivation from Childhood to Early 
Adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 36(4), 399-414.
Newsom, J. & Mahan, T.L. (2008). Stable negative social exchanges and health. Health 
Psychology, 27(1), 78-86.
O’Brien, G. (n.d.). What are the principles of adult learning? Retrieved January 
21, 2007, from http://southernhealth.org.au/cpme/articles/adult_learning.htm
Santesso, D. & Segalowitz, S. (2008). Developmental differences in error-related 
ERPs in middle- to late-adolescent males. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 205-217. 
Weingart, L. & Brett, J. (2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. 
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 994-1010. 
Wilson, D.K. (2008). Commentary for Health Psychology special issue: Theoretical 
advances in diet and physical activity interventions. Health Psychology, 27(1, Suppl), S1-S2.

SAMPLE RESPONSE 2

In the second edition of Anti-Terrorism and Criminal Enforcement, intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, begins in Chapter 2. Chapter 1 mainly focuses on the introductory of this book. Also he gives us so it gives us significant places and examples that are found in the book. Chapter 1 includes that the main emphasis is placed on this book is to tell us about domestic laws in the United States.
We examine legal definitions laws and bylaws that have made terrorism laws what it is today. Identify with the USA Patriot Act, it examines the different languages, it also shows us the world after 9/11. Chapter 1 is divided into parts, Introduction, Overview, introduction gives us US war on terrorism and I how it came about, and all those who are involved, overview shows us just how America is going about fighting this new war.
In this book as Chapter one indicates we will examine the legal category of terrorism’s and the definition of terrorism, terrorist, and related terms and phrases. Foreign policies that will interpret just what happens in other countries because a terrorist. Also it will discuss what American agents rules are in foreign countries, and also this book will focus on the Pentagon, Congress, Commander-in-Chief of United States in their roles in this war. 
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act added a new section 222 (5301) to the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act sets out detailed statutory requirements for persons interviewing for visa application for the first time. This new provision is interpreting advisory with respect to foreign diplomats and officials. In other words the department’s regulations permitting exemptions from interviews for certain diplomats and officials remain in effect. This act is mainly centered on keeping terror style of his country
Section 5301 also under this particular act a person must be an interview if they are between the ages of 14 and 79 unless they are eligible for a waiver. Also under 5301 section 222 give the Secretary of State waive their rights. In the signing statement President George W. Bush made it clear that his administration would treat 5301 as advisory. 
Therefore the department regulations permitting exemptions from interviews for persons in certain categories and classifications. This act does not give one person authority to make decisions on their own. President Bush indicated that this would be and advisory. The classifications that are exempt from interviews under 5301 section 222 are as followed: A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3 and so on. My understanding is that section 222 is just advisory, to give diplomatic people special privileges. I don’t see where it affects the war on terrorism; it looks like bureaucracy, someone trying. President Bush signed a bill that is very iffy; it has no control over the outcome of the war on terrorism. If we are to win this war we must put forth a better effort, wasting vital energy and time doing nothing. 9/11 triggered the US attack on terrorism, it started several decades ago, but it is now on the move. Following the attack on the Pentagon the twin Towers in New York the war on terrorism took a new turn. I believe that Congress, United States government, Commander-in-Chief Bush must share the power to reach a common goal, that goal is destroying terrorism domestic a worldwide.
References
Moscowitz, J.,  Tedlie, E., Elissa S. & Acree, M. (2008). Positive affect uniquely predicts 
lower risk of mortality in people with diabetes. Health Psychology, 27(1, Suppl), S73-S82.
Nunner-Winkler, G. (2007). Development of Moral Motivation from Childhood to Early 
Adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 36(4), 399-414.
Newsom, J. & Mahan, T.L. (2008). Stable negative social exchanges and health. Health 
Psychology, 27(1), 78-86.
O’Brien, G. (n.d.). What are the principles of adult learning? Retrieved January 
21, 2007, from http://southernhealth.org.au/cpme/articles/adult_learning.htm
Santesso, D. & Segalowitz, S. (2008). Developmental differences in error-related 
ERPs in middle- to late-adolescent males. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 205-217. 
Weingart, L. & Brett, J. (2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. 
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 994-1010. 
Wilson, D.K. (2008). Commentary for Health Psychology special issue: Theoretical