Health & Medical Question

Links for consumer demographics

https://data.census.gov/

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Health & Medical Question
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
  • https://www.usa.gov/statistics
  • https://www.bls.gov/bls/blswage.htm

    MHACB/506 v2
    East Chestnut Regional Health System Case
    Study: Pro-forma Income Statement
    A Pro-forma Income Statement is an income statement that predicts income for your new or revised
    product or service you are recommending to East Chestnut Regional Health System (ECRHS) after one
    year. It shows the sales ECRHS expects to achieve during that period of time, along with the costs
    associated with that level of sales. The organization must cover the costs of products or services it
    delivers (Cost of Sales) and the marketing expenses we estimate to achieve those sales (We estimate
    these using 7% of total revenues). This will leave us with a projected profit.
    A good Pro Forma proves out a strategy by showing the expected revenue minus the expected costs and
    the resulting profit. Conversely, it shows that you can’t have $100,000 in forecast sales and $3 million in
    projected advertising, since that would result in a loss.
    This is a very simplified exercise to help you understand the concept of a Pro Forma Income Statement.
    In reality, you would provide a much more in-depth analysis of expenses. For instance, if you were hiring
    two new sales reps, their salaries must be factored in.
    Below is an example of a Pro-forma Income Statement:
    Assume your projected sales revenue for one year for a new OB service to be $200,000.
    You calculate this by taking your projected revenue per visit from your Breakeven Analysis (we used $200
    per visit) x the number of visits you forecast from your projected market calculations in Part 1 of the
    assessment (in this example, it might be 1,000 visits).
    Next calculate the cost of sales. This is the Fixed Cost plus Total Variable Costs for 1,000 visits. Your
    total costs would be 1,000 x $100 variable cost per visit = $100,00 + the one-time construction fixed cost
    of $50,000 = $150,000 total costs (which is cost of sales).
    Your Gross Profit would be $200,000 – $150,000 = $50,000.
    Subtract your Marketing Cost (which we estimate at 7% x $200,000 = $14,000).
    This provides you with your Net Income ($50,000 – $14,000 = $36,000). This represents the total amount
    of profits you will generate in your first year.
    Finally, calculate the Net Profit Margin. ($36,000 / $200,000 = .18 or 18%). You will need to analyze if
    the total net income and total net profit margin fits within the objectives of your organization.
    Use this form to create your Pro Forma Income Statement. Enter the projected numbers, following the
    formulas beneath the line item.
    Write projected year against each project detail:






    Projected Sales Revenue:
    Cost of Sales (Fixed + Variable Expenses):
    Gross Profit (Projected Sales Revenue – Cost of Sales):
    Marketing Expenses (7% of Sales Revenue):
    Net Income (Projected Profit) (Gross Profit – Total Marketing Expenses):
    Net Profit Margin % (Does this amount of profit make sense?) (Net Income/Sales Revenue):
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 v2
    East Chestnut Regional Health System Case
    Study: Breakeven Analysis Worksheet
    Breakeven Analysis in economics, marketing, and cost accounting refers to the point at which total cost
    and total revenue are equal. A breakeven point analysis is used to determine the number of units of a
    product or service that must be sold to cover total costs (fixed and variable costs).
    This means you have covered all of your costs at the number of units sold the formula calculates.
    The formula for breakeven analysis is as follows:
    Breakeven quantity = Fixed costs / (Sales price per unit – Variable cost per unit)
    Example of Breakeven Analysis:
    Your clinic wants to offer obstetrical services at your women’s center.
    Assume you know that a new suite of offices will need to be designed within your existing facility in which
    to provide the service. The cost for build out for these offices will cost $50,000. This is a one-time charge.
    This represents your fixed cost.
    Assume your OB physician cost is $70 per office visit of 15 minutes. The cost for your office staff per
    patient visit is $20 per office visit of 15 minutes. Supplies used per office visit is estimated at $10. The
    total variable cost associated with one office visit of 15 minutes is the sum of these charges ($70 + $20 +
    $10 = $100) or $100 per 15-minute office visit.
    Assume your clinic charges a total revenue of $200 per 15-minute office visit per patient.
    To determine the breakeven point for offering OB service at your clinic, plug these numbers into the
    formula:
    Break even quantity = $50,000 / ($200 – $100) = $50,000 / $100 = 500 patient visits.
    Therefore, given the fixed costs, variable costs, and revenue gained for each patient visit, your
    organization would need to provide 500 OB office visit to break even during the period of one year.
    Use this form to create your ECRHS Breakeven Analysis. Enter the projected numbers, following the
    formulas next to the line item.
    Breakeven elements are listed below write breakeven costs and revenue against each element:





    Costs:
    Fixed costs (A set one-time cost that will be required to product or deliver a product or service, such
    as construction of new office or lab space. This occurs once, and does not vary based on the number
    of products or services delivered):
    Variable costs (Costs that repeat each time the product or service is manufactured or delivered,
    such as physician salary per procedure or visit, office staff salary per procedure or visit, supplies used
    per procedure or visit, calculated per individual visit):
    Revenue per Product or Service delivered (per visit):
    Breakeven Quantity Required (Fixed Costs / [Revenue per Unit – Variable Cost per Unit]):
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 v2
    CASE STUDY: EAST CHESTNUT REGIONAL
    HEALTH SYSTEM
    History
    Within the last 10 years, East Chestnut Regional Health System (ECRH) was formed from the merger of
    three organizations: East River Medical Center, Northern Mountain Hospital Consortium, and Archway
    Hospital.
    East River Medical Center (ERMC)
    ERMC is the anchor hospital for the system. The medical center resides along the east side of the
    Chestnut River. Historically, ERMC was recognized as the location of choice for medical care. However,
    this reputation has deteriorated over the last 3 to 5 years. As the city of Chestnut has grown, ERMC has
    found itself on the edge of an urban blight. Safety has been a concern for patients, visitors, and
    physicians who use and serve the medical center. The technology offered at the medical center has been
    maintained at an excellent level of proficiency. At the same time, the medical staff is aging with the
    average age of the physicians being 57. There are younger primary care physicians who serve the
    specialists, but the specialists are aging as well. ERMC boasts a Level 1 Trauma Center with an air
    service. The total number of licensed beds for ERMC is 550. On any given day, the occupancy rate is 300
    heads on the beds.
    Northern Mountain Hospital Consortium (NMHC)
    NMHC was originally formed in response to the migration of patients to Chestnut. Due to the rather
    aggressive strategies carried out by the hospitals in Chestnut, these rural hospitals decided to create a
    consortium of rural hospitals so that they could gain economies of scale in a number of areas, which
    include group purchasing, benefit administration, and physician and staff recruitment. Additionally, they
    worked together to stem any further deterioration of their market share. Patients were selecting to go to
    the larger community for services and leaving the smaller communities that collared the Chestnut
    metropolitan area. NMHC represented individual hospitals in four counties that circled Chestnut County:
    Walnut, Butternut, Oak, and Maple. Walnut and Butternut Counties had good employment with Oak and
    Maple Counties being mostly rural. In each county, the inpatient facilities averaged about 20 years of age.
    The upkeep of these facilities has been sketchy. No facility needs any major upgrades, but modernization
    is needed. The state does not have a Certificate of Need (CON) process. The medical staff makeup
    varies each location. The hospitals in Oak and Maple Counties are critical access hospitals. Further
    details will be provided regarding these organizations later in the case study.
    Archway Hospital (AH)
    AH is located directly in the community of Chestnut. It fully resides in the urban area of the community.
    The hospital has 200 registered beds, but on any given day there are only 50 to 75 patients in this facility.
    This hospital was a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) hospital; therefore, most of the physicians that worked out
    of this facility were DOs. The payer mix for this hospital was heavily burdened with Medicare and
    Medicaid. This payer mix composed nearly 85% of the reimbursement. The facility is aging and needs
    considerable repairs. It is questionable if it will be worth the investment in this facility.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 2 of 10
    Leadership and Organizational Culture
    The original merger that created the East Chestnut Regional Health System (ECRH) occurred 10 years
    ago. This merger was between ERMC and AH. AH had a rather dynamic leader who was about 57 years
    old at the time of the merger. The AH CEO became the new President and Chief Executive Officer of
    ECRH after the merger. Since this CEO had only worked in a smaller organization, he had not
    experienced the cultural changes and demands that occur after the merging of a large organization.
    Additionally, he began to change the culture of the organization such that decisions were made on a
    decentralized basis. He trusted the management team at AH to do the right things and make the right
    decisions with low supervision. However, the Chief Operating Officer (COO) who was put in charge was
    originally from AH but left 2 years after the merger with a new COO being put in place. This COO
    developed a rather poor reputation and was known to want to build his own empire at AH and to be
    dishonest at times. This reputation created a culture within the traditional AH that lacked a cohesive team
    effort to create a system. This positioning of the COO was left unattended by the President and CEO of
    ECRH since he was actively pursuing the acquisition of NMHC. The hospitals of NMHC were doing okay,
    but those in the consortium realized that their ability to stand alone was becoming difficult in today’s
    market. When the leadership of the consortium assessed the market as to a partnership, they decided
    that ECRH would be the best choice. The other option was to develop a for-profit hospital that also
    resided in Chestnut. The leadership was attracted to what they saw happen with AH. They liked that the
    central leadership of the system allowed AH to continue as their own entity without a lot of centralized
    control.
    By the time all of this was put together, the President and CEO of ECRH was near retirement. He retired
    about three years after the merger activity was complete. During those three years, he became lax in his
    leadership role. ECRH deteriorated in market share and profitability during this time. Upon his retirement,
    the Board of ECRH performed a national search for a replacement. They employed Hunter Brown as the
    new President and CEO. Mr. Brown was the CEO of a smaller health system and had been in that
    position for nearly 10 years. Therefore, he had limited experience from other markets in the art of
    strategic implementation. However, he was also well trained, bright, and articulate in expressing his
    knowledge. He has now been the President/CEO of ECRH for nine months.
    As for the remainder of the leadership team for ECRH, there is a newly hired corporate counsel. She has
    15 years of experience and is extremely competent in the work that she does.
    The CEO also hired a new Chief Financial Officer. He has taken good strides in managing the accounts
    receivable throughout the system as well as extracting exceptional dollars from high quality supply chain
    management.
    The Chief Operating Officer (COO) is new and has three years of previous experience from the same
    organization where the CEO departed.
    The Chief Medical Officer (CMO) has been retained from the old leadership team. His reputation is
    excellent, and he works well with other physicians, including the medical staff and the employed
    physicians.
    The Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) is three years away from retirement. She is known for not getting along
    with the medical staff and will always defend nursing when at times this is not appropriate.
    The Senior Vice President for Human Resources is competent and respected by management and staff
    throughout the organization.
    The remainder of the leadership team was retained from the old regime. This included information
    technology, employed physician group leadership, marketing, human resources, and other vice
    presidents or directors responsible for varying service lines. It should be noted that the IT leadership is
    just completing the implementation of the EPIC system. The future for this team depends on how well the
    overall implementation of the system goes. Likewise, those in the marketing department will need to be
    stellar in senior leadership advisement regarding the marketing of complex issues that will be
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 3 of 10
    encountered ahead. They have been told if marketing misses the target, then replacements will occur
    within this department.
    The new CEO inherited the management team of AH and NMHC. For NMHC the organizational structure
    was left intact with the COOs for each of the individual hospitals being retained. It was agreed that this
    traditional structure would be left intact for at least five years. This agreement was near its end and the
    new CEO had plans to change the existing structure as well as management. This change was being
    considered for this year’s strategic plan development. Even if the structure of NMHC was going to be
    changed to a more direct relationship with corporate leadership, the existing COO’s would be retained as
    they have performed well since the merger. As for the COO of AH, he had been recently terminated. An
    interim COO is now in place pending the board approved closure of this hospital.
    Competitive Assessment
    ECRH was not the only provider of care in the community. There was a for-profit hospital, Banford
    Medical Center (BMC), that had been purchased by a large publicly traded for-profit health system about
    10 years ago. The for-profit health system was the largest in the country. The CEO of this hospital was
    good at optimizing performance because of the weaknesses of ECRH and its leadership. He was an
    effective opportunist.
    BMC has 400 registered beds with a current occupancy rate of 85%. They have been effective at taking
    market share away from ECRH. For each loss of service line market share by ECRH, BMC has shown
    proportional gains. After the acquisition of BMC, the for-profit immediately moved to build a new facility.
    This new facility is located on the growing wealthy edge of the community. Additionally, at the time that
    this new facility was developed, the for-profit syndicated ownership to the physicians. The highest level of
    syndication occurred with the obstetrics and gynecology physicians in the community. Therefore,
    women’s services deteriorated at ECRH. It should be noted that this physician syndication occurred
    before the Affordable Care Act was passed, which precluded hospital ownership by physicians.
    It is important that additional information is provided regarding ECRH. ECRH recently purchased 100
    acres of land across the interstate from BMC. This land is located northwest of Chester. The intention is
    to eventually build a new medical center on this location. The initial planning of this land has occurred,
    and it has been approved to build a regional oncology center on this site. The construction of the project
    is already underway with an anticipated completion in 6 months.
    In addition, ECRH has an orthopedic hospital attached to the current ERMC site and a behavioral health
    hospital at this same location. ECRH also has two ambulatory surgical centers that are conveniently
    located on the growing northwest and southwest side in the community. The one surgical center is
    located on the 100-acre development site. The orthopedic hospital has done well and has been listed in
    the top 100 orthopedic hospitals. However, the behavioral health hospital is losing significant dollars, so
    the Board of Directors for ECRH has decided to close this hospital. ECRH has also developed a joint
    venture imaging center with the radiologists. This center resides across from a major shopping area in the
    community. It is conveniently located near heavily populated neighborhoods and shopping. The only
    downside is the location is not close to physician offices that would refer to this center. However, if a new
    facility is built on the 100 acres, which would include physician offices, the imaging center will be in an
    ideal location. Leadership is developing a free-standing emergency center on the 100-acre site, which is
    on the northwest side of Chestnut.
    The last competitive issue is the location of a medical school and hospital in the city of Chestnut. The
    facility resides in a downtown location. This medical school had been established by the state nearly 45
    years ago and is associated with Greenbranch University. It mostly serves the indigent community in
    Chestnut and the surrounding area. This academic center has a rather negative reputation in the
    surrounding area. There are four other medical academic centers in the state as well as a medical center
    with a world-renowned reputation. There have been ongoing rumors that this world-renowned
    organization was planning on assuming the responsibility of the Chestnut academic center. This change
    would substantially alter the complexion of the local medical community if it were to occur. Speed in
    ECRH dealing with some of its market issues is an imperative.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 4 of 10
    Additional Market Information: Population Demographics
    Chestnut County





    With 433,689 people, Chestnut County is the 6th most populated county in the state.
    The largest Chestnut County racial/ethnic groups are Caucasian (70.1%), African American (18.5%),
    and Hispanic (6.5%).
    In 2015, the median household income of Chestnut County residents was $41,777. However, 21.1%
    of Chestnut County residents live in poverty.
    The median age for Chestnut County residents is 37.7 years old.
    Employment is strong in Chestnut County. Unemployment resides at 4.5%. Employer diversity is
    strong since the community is not dependent on singular large employers. Employment includes
    some high-tech jobs, general manufacturing to support the automobile industry, and there is a large
    university, Greenbranch University, located in the community. The university has 25,000 students and
    offers most majors, which includes engineering and nursing.
    Walnut County




    With 42,537 people, Walnut County is the 57th most populated county in the state.
    The largest Walnut County racial/ethnic groups are Caucasian (89.8%), followed by Hispanic (7.2%)
    and African American (3%).
    In 2015, the median household income of Walnut County residents was $55,120. However, 10.8% of
    Walnut County residents live in poverty.
    The median age for Walnut County residents is 39.8 years old.
    Butternut County




    With 38,352 people, Butternut County is the 65th most populated county in the state.
    The largest Butternut County racial/ethnic groups are White (87.0%), Hispanic (9.5%), and African
    American (1.7%).
    In 2015, the median household income of Butternut County residents was $50,663. However, 13.4%
    of Butternut County residents live in poverty.
    The median age for Butternut County residents is 39.7 years old.
    Oak County




    With 37,120 people, Oak County is the 66th most populated county in the state.
    The largest Oak County racial/ethnic groups are Caucasian (93.3%), Hispanic (4.0%), and African
    American (1.1%).
    In 2015, the median household income of Oak County residents was $42,492. However, 14.9% of
    Oak County residents live in poverty.
    The median age for Oak County residents is 46.6 years old.
    Maple County



    With 27,816 people, Maple County is the 79th most populated county in the state.
    The largest Maple County racial/ethnic groups are Caucasian (90.8%), Hispanic (7.1%), and African
    American (1.0%).
    In 2015, the median household income of Maple County residents was $39,353. However, 15.4% of
    Maple County residents live in poverty.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 5 of 10


    The median age for Maple County residents is 48.2 years old.
    Both Oak and Maple Counties are rural with an older population. Many patients have Medicare and
    Medicaid that come from these two counties. Likewise, the hospitals located in each of these counties
    have been designated as critical access. Like many rural counties, Oak and Maple have been
    blighted with younger people using drugs, including methamphetamine.
    Employed Physicians
    ECRH employs 400 physicians throughout its system. The breakdown for each location is as follows:
    Chestnut County


    135 primary care
    100 specialists
    Walnut County


    40 primary care
    10 specialists
    Butternut County


    30 primary care
    12 specialists
    Oak County


    27 primary care
    10 specialists
    Maple County


    25 primary care
    11 specialists
    There have been ongoing complaints from the newly recruited physicians that their practices have not
    been marketed well; thus, their patient volumes have been slow to grow.
    Service Line Performance Information
    The following is a list of bullet points regarding service line performance by ECRH and issues of
    operational concern.
    1. Women’s health services deteriorated significantly since the syndication by Banford Medical Center.
    Obstetrical deliveries are down 20% across the system. BMC has done an excellent job of creating
    attractive facility and services for women. This includes nurse navigation, women’s breast center, and
    a series of other amenities. BMC has also started a neonatal intensive care unit, which rivals the
    services of ECRH.
    2. The cardiologists at ECRH are aging. This has been a traditionally strong service for ECRH, but 50%
    of the cardiologists will be retiring within the next 3 to 5 years. All cardiologists who serve ERCH are
    employed by the health system. Cardiology is a service that is gaining strength within the
    Greenbranch Medical Center, particularly since they brought in a renowned cardiologist to rebuild
    their program.
    3. The orthopedic volumes are down 7%. ECRH does jointly operate an orthopedic hospital with an
    independent orthopedic group located in the community. There have been some internal problems
    within the orthopedic group where the old guard of orthopedic surgeons has forced a low retention
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 6 of 10
    with younger, and to some degree better trained, surgeons. Retention is becoming a growing concern
    regarding the status of this group with consideration of ECRH hiring their own surgeons. The joint
    venture hospital does not exclude other surgeons from working in this hospital.
    4. Emergency department (ED) volumes are down 5%. The hospital uses an emergency physician
    group to supply physicians to cover all of the EDs within ERCH. These physicians are known for poor
    customer service and making rude comments to patients who are self-pay or Medicaid.
    5. The ambulatory visits and services are up 3%. This volume increase is from the younger primary care
    physicians who have been employed by ECRH. This young group of physicians has become great
    support for ECRH and refer patients loyally to the organization.
    6. General surgery cases are down 4%. The aging surgeons are starting to retire, and it is difficult to
    recruit new surgeons to replace past demand. Some of this work is going to Greenbranch since they
    have good general surgeons.
    7. The oncology services for ECRH have increased in volume and revenue by 4%. ECRH’s
    development of the new oncology center has created a magnet for referrals to the oncologists. The
    oncologists are very enthusiastic about the development of this new center and have begun to shift
    work to ECRH.
    8. ECRH has the regional burn center. ECRH works with Greenbranch Medical Center for training
    residence in the burn setting. This includes the plastic and general surgeons. The downside of this
    service is that it is losing money. A decision has been made to close this service with Greenbranch
    starting their burn center.
    9. ECRH is a Level 1 Trauma Center, and this designation has been a historical positive for the system.
    The helicopter service is well recognized by the community as well as first responder professionals
    found in the region. They historically have been top for major trauma cases. The usage of this service
    is down 5% since the for-profit has established a similar service. BMC however only has a Level 2
    Trauma Center. They have worked diligently to acquire ambulance services in some of the outlying
    communities. This has helped feed patients to BMC.
    10. The ECRH Board of Directors decided to close the behavioral health hospital. It is uncertain where
    patients will be able to receive inpatient care. An active out-patient service will still be provided by
    ECRH.
    Payer Mix
    The payer mix for ECRH has deteriorated. The current inpatient payer mix for the entire system is as
    follows:



    55% Medicare
    15% Medicaid
    30% Commercial
    There has been a long-standing joint venture relationship with a national insurance company for
    commercial insurance. Administratively this venture has not developed as anticipated; however, in some
    of the regional markets, the Chestnut Care insurance has a strong presence. Of the 30% commercial pay,
    20% is Chestnut Care based. The national insurance company in the venture is Aetna. The next
    strongest product is Anthem. It is the expectation of the CEO that Chestnut Care be leveraged and
    positioned for growth.
    The 15% Medicaid has helped the hospital gain additional disproportionate share dollars, which does help
    the bottom line of the hospital.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 7 of 10
    Historical Strategic Initiatives
    Accountable Care Organization
    When the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, ECRH decided to get into the one-sided model of an
    accountable care organization (ACO). This venture has not gone well, and ECRH has decided to leave
    the ACO business. However, they are concerned about the public image of this decision. The details of
    the termination are under discussion with a need to determine how to minimize the public perception of
    termination, particularly since there was so much marketing of their getting in this venture. The regulatory
    requirements of the government regarding the timing of terminating an ACO venture further complicate
    this decision.
    Primary Care Medical Home
    The employed primary care group has been active in establishing accredited primary care medical homes
    within all the primary care offices throughout the ECRH system. This initiative is a positive emerging
    strategy for ECRH. It has also been an attractive draw for the family practitioners from Greenbranch
    Medical Center residency program since Greenbranch has established an accredited medical home for
    their family practice residency program.
    American Nursing Credential Center Status (ANCC)
    ECRH has been working on becoming a magnet status for ERMC. This work has stalled out as an
    initiative. Some of this is due to the nursing leadership within ERMC. The CEO intends to move this
    priority up in the organization’s goals.
    Information Technology
    ECRH has invested heavily in their information technology infrastructure. This investment became a
    requirement just to be able to gather the data needed for the ACO development. This cost has become
    significantly greater than anticipated. ECRH fully implemented EPIC as their core information technology
    system. There have been implementation problems since the ECRH was operating off multiple systems
    before the decision to consolidate to one platform. The implementation of EPIC required considerable
    retraining for the staff and physicians. Data conversions have gone well. The difficulties have been more
    human-related relative to the effective use of the system. One of the major issues has been the lack of
    ECRH not meeting meaningful use requirements which has cost ECRH significant lost revenue from not
    meeting these goals.
    Legal Actions Pending for ECRH
    Federal Trade Commission Investigation
    With the merger and acquisition of NMHC, questions of antitrust have been raised. In the service lines of
    cardiology and oncology it has been found that ECRH controls 60% of the cardiology market and 52% of
    the oncology market. Chestnut Care in some markets has been strong in steering patient volumes to
    ERMC. Union leaders for the varying trades were instrumental in precipitating this investigation. At the
    time that this issue was raised, the President and Executive Branch of the federal government were very
    pro-labor, thus, their interest in pursuing this matter.
    As to the projected disposition of this case, it is anticipated that a negative determination will be made
    due to the market share control in oncology and cardiology. This could force ECRH to divest their
    ownership in the Chestnut Care insurance venture. Another option might be that certain hospitals of
    NMHC be divested. It is not anticipated that both determinations would occur. This case has cost ECRH
    considerable money to stave off investigation of this allegation.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 8 of 10
    Predatory Collections and the Loss of Not-for-profit Tax
    Status for NMHC
    NMHC negotiated that they would continue to act independently. The consortium leadership set policies
    that included predatory collections for the patients that would be served in the NMHC hospitals. In a
    recent evening news report, an investigative reporter interviewed an elderly patient that had her home
    taken from her to pay for her medical bills. This home had been in her family for over 100 years. This
    story prompted the state’s Attorney General’s Office to investigate the predatory collection policies of
    ECRH and NMHC.
    The state has already taken an aggressive stance to investigate the status of not-for-profits not fulfilling
    requirements (e.g., charity care, research, and education). The state is in economic trouble and is
    seeking revenue from wherever they can find it. The outlook is dim regarding the anticipated final decision
    of the Attorney General’s Office. If NMHC is required to pay taxes, this would wipe out the bottom line for
    these hospitals and many of the needed services supplied to the indigent population by ECRH would be
    reduced or eliminated.
    Faith & Main Consultants Report
    Within the last year, ECRH contracted with Faith & Main to study the market perception of their women’s
    services. The following is a summation of the findings of Faith & Main.
    Interest in a Women’s Center Crosses County Lines



    36% of women in the service area would travel across county lines to receive excellent women’s
    health services
    72% of women in Chestnut County would consider using the women’s services of East Chestnut
    Regional Medical Center
    Women in all counties were most interested in these services:
    o Breast care
    o General gynecology services
    o Female doctors
    o Services in one area
    o Physicals for women
    Interest in a Heart Care and a Health Information Line


    A physician approved source of information.
    A nurse help line that could be a resource for women’s care in heart health as well be a source for
    health navigation.
    Clear Expectations Regarding Getting Appointments with
    Their Primary Care Physician


    Women expect same-day appointments
    o In the collar counties to Chestnut County, women ranked this in the top 28.7%
    o Chestnut County women ranked this in the top 37.7%
    o Expectation of same-day appointments ranked highest for women of childbearing age
    Percent expecting same-day appointments
    o 42.9 % of Chestnut County women of childbearing age
    o 31.3% of collar county women of childbearing age
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 9 of 10

    Willingness to be Seen by a Nurse Practitioner Overwhelmingly “Yes”
    o 75.7% of Chestnut County women of childbearing age
    o 76.1% of collar county women of childbearing age
    Respondents Expressed How Health Care Could Be
    Improved

    24% of all Chestnut County women, and 26% of all collar county women named adding more primary
    care doctors and more children’s care with urgent care outranking any other single topic.
    Respondents of Childbearing Age Widely Represented in
    Study:


    86% of women respondents of childbearing age in Chestnut County had children under the age of 18
    76% of women respondents of childbearing age in the collar counties had children under the age of
    18
    Willingness to be seen by nurse practitioner was viewed as favorable by those in this study.
    This data from Faith & Main will be used to ramp up improvements in the women’s services for ECRH.
    Strategic Plan Goals for the Upcoming Year











    Women’s service line improvement
    o Increase obstetrical deliveries by 20% over 3 years
    o Establish nurse navigation system for the entire system
    o Facility improvement and development for women’s services
    o Improve access standards for women’s care
    • Assist in the marketing of the implementation of the consultant’s report regarding
    women’s services
    Oncology Center grand opening
    Mature the retail strategy with the primary care employed physician group
    Assess the market impact of the lawsuits and develop marketing strategy to counteract the negative
    impact if decisions are made against ECRH
    Aggressively recruit new physicians to reduce the average age of the medical staff and strategically
    enhance service line development
    Use lean management processes to correct service issues found in the ED. Improve ED visits by 6%.
    o Review physician contracts to enhance physician service performance
    o Investigate the fast-track ED concept
    o Implement the free-standing ED strategy
    Abandon the Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
    Re-establish relationships with regional emergency medical services to raise the utilization of the
    medical air service. Growth goal is to get back to the previous level of utilization within 18 months
    Decision to close the regional burn unit and let those cases go to the academic medical center
    Implement the decision to close the behavioral health services of ECRH
    Implement the decision to close AH
    CEO Instruction to Marketing Team
    The marketing department for East Chestnut Regional Health System will be asked to step up their game
    to develop a marketing plan for the regional health system. The CEO has had some concerns regarding
    the ability of the marketing department to keep up with the rapidly moving strategic environment that he
    has created. Therefore, he established a timeline for the department to develop a system wide marketing
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System
    MHACB/506 v2
    Page 10 of 10
    plan over the next six weeks. The VP of marketing has been in all the senior leadership cabinet meetings,
    so she is aware of all the details. Therefore, the learning curve regarding the institutional strategic goals is
    of no concern.
    The following are elements that the CEO wants in the marketing plan.
    1. A consultant, Faith & Main, was used to test the impression of the women in the key service markets
    for East Chestnut Health System. The summary of the consultant’s report can be seen above. The
    survey covered all aspects of women’s care. The marketing department will need to develop a
    marketing campaign to match the recommendations of the consultant’s report.
    a. It is recognized that the age span for communicating with women consumers will be quite
    variable. On one end of the spectrum, you have the younger childbearing age women, next
    are the women that are middle aged followed by women that are pre-elderly then those that
    are elderly. Therefore, a communication plan using social media to conventional marketing
    techniques will be required.
    2. A communication plan will need to be developed for the closure of the regional burn center as well the
    exiting the accountable care organization and the closure of the behavioral health hospital.
    3. A communication plan will be needed to deal with the closure of AH.
    4. A branding strategy will need to be developed to overcome the current weak brand identity that is in
    place for the combined ECRH entities.
    5. Develop marketing strategy for new physicians being recruited to the system. The ideal situation
    would be to have a common identity for all marketing material. In the past the marketing material has
    been local hospital based.
    6. Develop marketing plan for the Primary Care Medical Home strategy as well the retail strategy for the
    primary care network.
    7. Proactively lay out a framework of communication to manage any negative outcomes of the legal
    matters that the health system is now confronting.
    a. The Federal Trade Commission investigation of the anti-trust issues for ECRH.
    b. The predatory collections occurred as part of NMHC. It is felt that this case will force these
    rural hospitals to move to a taxable entity with the loss of their not-for-profit status. The
    development of this problem came about due to poor leadership within the consortium.
    8. Develop advertising campaign for the opening of the new oncology center.
    9. Develop advertising campaign for the ED/Trauma services of ECRH.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 Competency 3 Assessment and Rubric
    Course Title: Ethical Marketing: The New Healthcare Economics
    Competency Assessment Title: Market Demand and Pro-forma Income Statement
    Assignment Directions
    In this part of the course, you will prepare a pro forma income statement for a new or revised product or service you recommend for East Chestnut
    Regional Health System.
    Review Case Study: East Chestnut Regional Health System.
    Pro Forma Income Statement for East Chestnut Regional Health:
    Please complete the following prior to preparing the pro forma income statement and budget. You will need the following information in order to
    prepare it.
    Part I: Market Size Calculation:
    Determine the size of the market for the ECRHS product or service you are recommending. Assume East Chestnut Regional Health is located in
    the market in which you live or work.
    Visit the University Library Consumer Demographics page.
    From this page, visit the United States Census Bureau sites linked under the Demographic Data heading. A rough estimate of need for health care
    products or services can be made based on the population demographics, using age, gender, and in some cases, race. On these sites, you can
    gain information on the total U.S. market for health care, as well as the number of U.S. consumers who fit your target market segmentation.
    Determine the local market for the product or service you recommend for East Chestnut Regional Health.
    Next, multiply the percentage of people likely to purchase your recommended ECRHS product or service by the estimate of market share you
    believe ECRHS can achieve for the product or service. For example, if there are 6,000 women who might be interested in ECRHS obstetrical
    services, and ECRHS has a potential 40 percent market share, this results in 2,400 patients.
    Prepare a 150- to 300-word summary of your market determination process.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 Competency 3 Rubric
    Page 2 of 4
    Part II: Breakeven Analysis:
    A breakeven analysis determines the number of products or amount of service that must be sold to consumers for the organization to break even
    or cover the costs of production or provision of the product or service.
    You will prepare a breakeven analysis for the case study client, East Chestnut Regional Health.
    Use the Breakeven Analysis Worksheet to prepare your analysis.
    Prepare a 150- to 300-word summary of your breakeven analysis that includes the following:



    The fixed and variable costs of product production or service provision
    The price and number of units sold at that price
    The number of units of product or service sold to cover the fixed and variable costs at the price level
    Part III: Pro Forma Income Statement:
    A pro forma is an income statement that predicts income for the new or revised product or service you are recommending to East Chestnut
    Regional Health System (ECRHS) after one year. It shows the sales ECRHS expects to achieve during that period of time, along with the costs
    associated with that level of sales. The organization must cover the costs of products or services it delivers (cost of goods sold) and the expenses
    we estimate to achieve those sales (salaries for sales reps, advertising and promotion, office expenses, etc.). This will leave us with a projected
    profit.
    A good pro forma income statement proves out a strategy by showing the expected revenue minus the expected costs and the resulting profit.
    Conversely, it shows, for example, that you can’t have $100,000 in forecast sales and $3 million in projected advertising, since that would result in
    a loss.
    Use the Pro Forma Income Statement Worksheet to create your pro forma income statement.
    Create a pro forma income statement based on the above. Include the following for 1 year:




    Projected sales volume in units and revenue
    Projected cost of goods/services
    Projected marketing expenses
    Projected net income
    Prepare a 500-word summary statement of your pro forma income statement for East Chestnut Regional Health System for the new or revised
    existing product or service you have recommended. Include the following:



    Summary of market size calculation (150 words)
    Summary of breakeven analysis (150 words)
    Summary of projected profit (200 words)
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 Competency 3 Rubric
    Page 3 of 4
    Part IV: Marketing Plan Considerations:
    Now that you have a better understanding of your market and the finances of the organization, you must consider how economics and finances
    can affect your marketing strategy.
    Write a 350- to 500-word analysis of how specific economic or financial issues will affect the marketing strategies for ECRHS.
    Submit your assignment.
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
    MHACB/506 Competency 3 Rubric
    Page 4 of 4
    Competency Assessment Rubric
    Assignment/Performance
    Criteria
    Mastery
    100%
    Meets Expectations
    85%
    Not Met
    0%
    Part I: Market Size
    Calculation
    (weight 24%)
    The student comprehensively
    described the marketdetermination process in the Part I
    summary.
    The student adequately described the
    market-determination process in the
    Part I summary.
    The student did not describe the
    market-determination process for the
    product or service.
    Part II: Breakeven Analysis
    (weight 24%)
    The student fully summarized the
    fixed and variable costs of product
    production or service provision, the
    price and number of units sold at
    that price, and the number of units
    of product or service sold to cover
    the fixed and variable costs at the
    price level.
    The student adequately summarized
    the fixed and variable costs of product
    production or service provision, the
    price and number of units sold at that
    price, and the number of units of
    product or service sold to cover the
    fixed and variable costs at the price
    level.
    The student did not summarize the
    fixed and variable costs of product
    production or service provision, the
    price and number of units sold at that
    price, or the number of units of
    product or service sold to cover the
    fixed and variable costs at the price
    level.
    Part III: Pro Forma Income
    Statement
    (weight 24%)
    The student thoroughly
    summarized the properly created
    pro forma income statement for
    East Chestnut Regional Health
    System for the new or revised
    existing product or service
    recommended, including a
    summary of market size
    calculation, a summary of
    breakeven analysis, and a
    summary of projected profit.
    The student sufficiently summarized
    the created pro forma income
    statement for East Chestnut Regional
    Health System for the new or revised
    existing product or service
    recommended, including a summary
    of market size calculation, a summary
    of breakeven analysis, and a
    summary of projected profit.
    The student did not summarize the
    created pro forma income statement
    for East Chestnut Regional Health
    System for the new or revised existing
    product or service recommended.
    Part IV: Marketing Plan
    Considerations
    (weight 24%)
    The student comprehensively
    explained how specific economic
    or financial issues can affect the
    marketing strategies for ECRHS.
    The student adequately explained
    how specific economic or financial
    issues can affect the marketing
    strategies for ECRHS.
    The student did not explain how
    specific economic or financial issues
    can affect the marketing strategies for
    ECRHS.
    Grammar and Writing
    Mechanics
    Accuracy in grammar, sentence
    structures, sentence boundaries,
    and word choice enhanced content
    Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar,
    sentence structures, sentence
    boundaries, and word choice did not
    detract from the content
    Frequent inaccuracies/errors in
    grammar, sentence structures,
    sentence boundaries, and word
    choice detracted from the content
    (weight 4%)
    Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

    Place your order
    (550 words)

    Approximate price: $22

    Calculate the price of your order

    550 words
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
    Total price:
    $26
    The price is based on these factors:
    Academic level
    Number of pages
    Urgency
    Basic features
    • Free title page and bibliography
    • Unlimited revisions
    • Plagiarism-free guarantee
    • Money-back guarantee
    • 24/7 support
    On-demand options
    • Writer’s samples
    • Part-by-part delivery
    • Overnight delivery
    • Copies of used sources
    • Expert Proofreading
    Paper format
    • 275 words per page
    • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
    • Double line spacing
    • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

    Our guarantees

    Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
    That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

    Money-back guarantee

    You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

    Read more

    Zero-plagiarism guarantee

    Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

    Read more

    Free-revision policy

    Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

    Read more

    Privacy policy

    Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

    Read more

    Fair-cooperation guarantee

    By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

    Read more
    Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

    Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code LEMONADE