HI5002: Finance For Business02 : Solution Essays

Question:

Prepare a brief description of the company, outlining the core activities, the market(s) in which it operates within and any factors in the companies’ history which you consider help present a “picture” of your company.

  1. Specify ownership-governance structure of the company:
  2. i) Name the main substantial shareholders:

Ø With higher than 20.00% of shareholdings. Based on this argument you should classify a firm as a family or non-family company, and

Ø With higher than 5.00% of shareholdings.

  1. ii) Name the main people involved in the firm governance:

Ø The Chairman

Ø Board members

Ø CEO.

Whether any of these people have the same surname as any of substantial shareholders (>20% share capital). If yes- you could use this as an argument for the presence of an owner or family member(s) in the firm’s governance.

Whether any of shareholders with more than 5% share capital are involved in firm governance.

 

Answer:

Preparing brief outline of the company, outlining core activities, markets and factors in company’s activities:

The main operation of Living Cell Technologies Ltd is to use biotechnology to improve wellbeing of people with serious diseases. The company aims in providing service to mankind by developing, discovering and commercializing regenerative treatments within humans. The company markets in Australia, which helps in generating required level of profits from operations. From the historical evaluation, Living Cell Technologies Ltd has been developing DIABECELL, as an effective treatment for unstable type 1 diabetes. The company has been developing treatment for neurological disorder since their establishment date of 1999 (Lctglobal.com 2018).

Naming the main substantial shareholders:

Main substantial shareholders

Number of Share held

% of issued share

HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Ltd

60,962,384

11%

Milford Asset Management

36,078,640

6%

Naming the main people involved in firm governance:

Position

Name of the Persons

The Chairman

Roy Austin

CEO

Ken Taylor

Director

Robert Elliott

Boards members

Laurie Hunter

Boards members

Bernard Tuch

Boards members

Robert Willcocks

 

 

Calculating return on assets, return on equity and debt ratio of the company:

Particulars

2017

2016

2015

2014

Net Profit After Tax

       (4,085,466)

       (3,123,208)

   (7,412,349)

   (4,943,490)

Total Assets

         8,694,360

         6,312,459

     5,464,515

     9,664,604

Ordinary Equity

       74,339,770

       68,406,383

   64,751,709

   60,685,600

Total Liabilities

         1,176,020

             635,798

         337,652

     1,233,027

Return on Assets

-46.99%

-49.48%

-135.65%

-51.15%

Return on Equity

-5.50%

-4.57%

-11.45%

-8.15%

Debt Ratio

13.53%

10.07%

6.18%

12.76%

Particulars

2017

EBIT

         (4,125,977)

TA

           8,694,360

NPAT

         (4,085,466)

EBIT

         (4,125,977)

TA

           8,694,360

OE

         74,339,770

NPAT/OE

(EBIT/TA) * (NPAT/EBIT) * (TA/OE)

NPAT/OE

-5.50%

Explaining the phenomenon captured by variable TA/OE, while depicting its impact on return on assets and return on owner’s equity:

Particulars

2017

2016

2015

2014

TA/OE

11.70%

9.23%

8.44%

15.93%

The calculation of TA/OE indicates the increment in asset, which is obtained by the company. this increment in asset in comparison with equity has allowed the organisation to obtain 11.70% in 2017 from 8.44% in 2015. This is directly increasing return on asset value, while decreasing return on equity.

Explaining why ROE is greater or less than ROA:

The ROA is less than ROE, as the overall asset value is less than ordinary equity obtained by Living Cell Technologies Ltd. The asset value in comparison with equity is relatively low, which is indicating low value of ROA in comparison with ROE (Filipovic, Kremslehner and Muermann 2015).

Preparing graph/chart for movements in the monthly share price cover last two years against All Ordinary Index:

Depicting how closely related are share price of the company and All Ordinary Index:

The evaluation of above graph helps in identifying the volatility of Living Cell Technologies Ltd, which is calculated at the levels of -0.0851. This relevant correlation value indicates that share price is negatively correlated, where increment in value of All Ordinary Share would result in the decline of Living Cell Technologies Ltd share value.

Providing significant announcements, which influenced share price of the organisation:

Date

Announcements

Factors

15-Nov-2017

Chairman Addressing 2017 annual report

Financial performance

16-Sep-2017

Sir Richard Faull on RNZ National discussing about Brain Research and finding a cure for Parkinson’s disease.

Research and Development

16-May-2017

Continuous halt in progression of Parkinson’s disease.

Research and Development

13-Jun-2017

Pig brain cells implanted into brains of people with Parkinson’s

Research and Development

1-Mar-2016

Parkinson’s Clinical trial

Research and Development

Depicting the calculated beta of the company:

The beta identified from Reuters is mainly calculated at the levels of 0.17, which could help in depicting risk level of Living Cell Technologies Limited (Au.reuters.com 2018).

Calculating rate of return of company’s share:

Particulars

Values

Beta

0.17

Risk free rate

4%

Market risk premium

6%

CAPM

4.34%

Explaining whether the company chosen is a conservative investment:

From the evaluation of overall beta and CAPM returns the investment scope of the organisation is determined. In addition, the overall beta indicates that the company comes under conservative investment section, where bet is less than 0.50.

Calculating WACC of the company:

Particulars

Values

Total Equity

   74,339,770.00

Total Debt

0.00

Total Capital

   74,339,770.00

Cost of debt

0.00

Cost of equity

4.34%

Tax

30.00%

WACC

4.34%

Explaining the implications that a higher WACC has on management’s evaluation on perspective investment project:

WACC valuation is mainly conducted to understand the cost of capital, which is required by the company to support its activities. In addition, high WACC mainly forces the management to select projects, which has higher return than their current WACC. This could eventually help in improving the return that is needed by the company to raise their profitability. Therefore, the management needs to be select projects in future, which could provide higher return than WACC or else it would not generate adequate return and increase their loss. Loughran and McDonald (2016) mentioned that with the use of WACC investors are able to understand minimum requirement that is needed by organisation to support their profitability.

Depicting whether optimal capital structure is used by the company:

Particulars

2017

2016

Total Assets

           8,694,360

           6,312,459

Total Liabilities

           1,176,020

              635,798

Debt Ratio

13.53%

10.07%

From the evaluation of above table debt ratio of the organisation could be identified, which is increasing at an alarming rate. This directly indicates that the company is acquiring debt to conduct its operations, which is portraying the chances of the company being insolvent in future.

Depicting what they have done to adjust their gearing ratio:

The company has mainly utilised share issue option to adjust its gearing ratio and improve their financial position. The directors have also acknowledged share issue, which was conducted to increase their cash reserves and raise their net assets.

Discussing the dividend policy adopted by the management:

From the evaluation of annual report, the company is not paying any kind of dividend, which portrays non-payment dividend policy adopted by the company. The management has not paid any kind of dividend to its shareholders after its incorporation.

Providing recommendations why the company could be included in his/her portfolio:

After evaluating annual report and share price performance of the company, it could be understood that adding the stock in the portfolio could directly result in loss. The company is losing share value and is incurring loss for more than 2 fiscal years. No progress can be seen from its annual report, which is highlighting a red flag for the investors. Therefore, discarding the stock could allow investor in improving its return and safeguard their investments.

 

Reference:

Au.finance.yahoo.com. (2018). LCT.AX: Summary for LIV CELL FPO – Yahoo Finance. [online] Available at: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/quote/LCT.AX?p=LCT.AX [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018].

Au.reuters.com. (2018). ${Instrument_CompanyName} Latest Company News. [online] IN. Available at: https://Au.reuters.com/finance/stocks/company-news/LCT.AX?date=01212018 [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018].

Filipovi?, D., Kremslehner, R. and Muermann, A., 2015. Optimal investment and premium policies under risk shifting and solvency regulation. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(2), pp.261-288.

Floyd, E. and List, J.A., 2016. Using field experiments in accounting and finance. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), pp.437-475.

Fourie, M.L., Opperman, L., Scott, D. and Kumar, K., 2015. Municipal finance and accounting. Van Schaik Publishers.

Gippel, J., Smith, T. and Zhu, Y., 2015. Endogeneity in Accounting and Finance Research: Natural Experiments as a State?of?the?Art Solution. Abacus, 51(2), pp.143-168.

Gippel, J., Smith, T. and Zhu, Y., 2015. Endogeneity in Accounting and Finance Research: Natural Experiments as a State?of?the?Art Solution. Abacus, 51(2), pp.143-168.

Lctglobal.com. (2018). Living Cell Technologies | History. [online] Available at: https://www.lctglobal.com/about-lct/history [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018].

Loughran, T. and McDonald, B., 2016. Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), pp.1187-1230.

Ramírez, R.R., 2017. Teaching ethics through court judgments in Finance, Accounting, Economics and Business. Etikk i praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 11(1), pp.61-87.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Homework help cost calculator

600 words
We'll send you the complete homework by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 customer support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • 4 hour deadline
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 300 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
× How can I help you?