A critical review of nursing practice is essential in maximizing patient outcomes. Inherent in this phrase is the knowledge regarding how evidence-based practice (EBP) is implemented. EBP has been an issue of concern among healthcare administrators, researchers and staff. Within this concept is the aspect of external and internal evidence. Decisions regarding health-related issues are normally achieved after synthesizing the external and internal evidence (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2017). The objective of this essay is to discuss the differences between internal evidence and external evidence and eventually explain how these types of evidence can be utilized for quality improvement in the clinical setting.
The Difference between Internal and External Evidence
Internal evidence consists of the knowledge obtained through training and formal education, specific experience due to the clinician-patient relationship and the generation experienced obtained through daily practice. It is normally created, utilized and retained within the organization of the client. Internal evidence entails clinical expertise, healthcare quality improvement projects at institutional level and outcome management initiatives (Porzsolt, et al. 2003). For instance, the internal evidence is normally applied especially in diagnostic reasoning like practice data available in healthcare records.
On the other hand, external evidence includes best practice, clinical practice guidelines, systematic review, and randomized control trials that offer assistance in implementing clinical practice changes. It is any information that can be accessed through research. External evidence is therefore found in scientific research and randomized control trials (Porzsolt, et al. 2003).
Utilization for Quality Improvement
The availability of sound evidence determines the effectiveness of quality improvement projects. The interventions influence the effectiveness of such initiatives or projects in terms of cost-effective and clinical importance as well as the utilization of sound evidence to implement predefined approaches or products. Internal and external evidence aims to fill translational gaps that establish a framework for implementation and quality improvement (Gillam & Siriwardena, 2014).
Gillam, S., & Siriwardena, A. N. (2014). Evidence-based healthcare and quality improvement. Quality in primary care, 22(3), 125-132.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2017). Nursing research-E-book: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.Porzsolt, F., Ohletz, A., Thim, A., Gardner, D., Ruatti, H., Meier, H., … & Schrott, L. (2003). Evidence-based decision making—the six-step approach. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 8(6), 165-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebm.8.6.165
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more