Purpose:
This essay is meant to look at the folly of succumbing to collective anxiety, and letting hysteria take a hold of society.
There is an inherent danger in allowing the society to fall victim to those who incite mass hysteria and panic, especially if they do so for their own purposes. As evidenced in the two historical accounts, one in Salem in 1692 and another in 1952 in the cold war era, the society derives no benefits from allowing fear to control it. Under such conditions, unscrupulous persons may take advantage, and push for their own ends without regard about who they hurt in the process.
Outline
The Folly of Succumbing To Collective Anxiety
History does repeat itself. The similarities between two of the darkest chapters in American history illustrate this point clearly enough. In 1692, Salem which was a small Puritanical village in colonial Massachusetts, a number of people resorted to settling old scores through accusations of witchcraft. Accused parties were tried, convicted and in a majority of cases burnt as witches. All this based on spectral evidence (Latner 139). The situation was closely mirrored almost three centuries later during the McCarthyism era. In 1952, millions of people are accused of being communists, put to trial and convicted. In this instance too, spectral evidence was applied. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, the author chooses to focus the ills of paranoia and hysteria, and the destruction these two qualities can wrought in a community. The collective anxiety displayed in the Salem witch trials of 1692 and the McCarthyism era of 1952 point to how individuals can incite mass fear and hysteria to their own ends. The ensuing hysteria and collective anxiety, and the resulting unfair treatment of members of the society point to the dangers of letting paranoia gain control society.
In both cases accusations served to advance personal agendas. In The Crucible, the young girls make unsubstantiated claims about the existence of witches in the community (Miller 12). Abigail uses the witch hunt as an opportunity to get at Elizabeth, Proctor’s wife, her rival for Proctor’s attentions. Betty when she slips into consciousness accuses Abigail of drinking a charm to kill John Proctor’s wife. Abigail does not present any proof, but that does not stop the Elizabeth Proctor’s interrogation, or subsequent imprisonment. Others who use false accusations to settle scores are Ann Putnam against Rebecca Nurse, and Ruth Putnam whose accusations enable her father to acquire land (Miller 99).The same can be said for McCarthyism, as the Communist witch hunt of the 1950s has come to be known. Senator Joseph McCarthy made the claim that some “200 card carrying members of the Communist party” had infiltrated the American government. While he had no substantive proof, that did not stop the establishment of the House Un-American Committee (HUAC) from investigating suspected communists. McCarthy’s aim was to advance his political ambitions. In both cases, personal interests drove the false accusations.
In both incidents, unsubstantiated claims ruined lives and increased hostility. In The Crucible, the girl’s unsubstantiated claims only serve to fraction the community further and ruin lives. By 1692 when the Salem witch trials came to an end, nineteen people-and two dogs-had been convicted for practicing witchcraft and hanged. To make the farce even greater, the accused were asked to name other witches in the community. Proctor is sentenced to hang because he will not confess or divulge the identities of others. McCarthyism was no different as those who were accused were assumed guilty, put on trial, and under threat of imprisonment asked to divulge the names of fellow Communists. The end result was destruction of livelihoods. Some of the more prominent victims of McCarthyism include Owen Lattimore, a career diplomat accused of being a soviet spy and Val Lorwin, a labor economist who was accused of harboring communists (Turpen n.p). The sorriest case though was that of William Remington. Remington was killed by a prisoner hoping to get a lighter sentence for “killing a Communist” (Meyer Filardo 178). Evidently, in both cases, the accusations led to the destruction of lives.
Both situations were enabled by people failing to act to stop the trials before they went too far. In The Crucible, the people are afraid to stand up and oppose the proceedings in fear of being accused of being witches. Mary Warren is afraid to tell on Abigail when she threatens to say she participated as well (Miller 20). In the end, she is probably Abigail’s greatest accomplice. Even Proctor is initially reluctant to defend those that Abigail accuses. In the McCarthyism era, the media is reluctant to intervene. They gave prominence to McCarthy’s accusations, but fail to point out the responses of the accused. The media also failed to interrogate the truth of McCarthy’s accusations. Admittedly, the failure by the townspeople and the media to intervene in the Salem witch trials and McCarthy’s red hunt respectively paved way for the protracted trials.
To conclude, hysteria and collective anxiety have the capability to reduce members of society to mindless acts all in the name of fear. In such situations, it is also likely that some people will take advantage of the fear to pursue their own objectives, usually to the detriment of society. Further, it is the responsibility of society to identify when individuals are merely pushing their own ends, and stopping them before any damage is done. In all, the two incidents serve to warn of the dangers of letting fear take control of our sensibilities.
Works Cited
Latner, R. ‘The Long And Short Of Salem Witchcraft: Chronology And Collective Violence In 1692’. Journal of Social History 42.1 (2008): 137-156. Web.
Meyer Filardo, Peter. ‘United States Communist History Bibliography, 2007–2008’. American Communist History 8.2 (2009): 197-223. Web.
Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell, 1997. Print.
Turpen, Bill L. “Remembering Sen. Joseph Mccarthy With A New ‘Campus-Watch’ Witch Hunt.” Washington Report On Middle East Affairs 21.9 (2002): 62. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Oct. 2015.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more