NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Collaboration Cafe Paper

Module Reflective Discussion Guidelines
and Rubric
PURPOSE
The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned
during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning
within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes.
DUE DATE
•
•
Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session.
Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session
and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS
REFLECTION OVERVIEW
This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this
course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first
week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course
session.
For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module,
and respond to the following questions.
Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you
hope to learn during this module of study?
Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding
the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome
addressed during this module.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
1
REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above.
3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph
structures.
4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions.
REFLECTION CRITERIA
Category
Points
%
Description
Reflection 1
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student
hopes to learn during this module.
Reflection 2
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in
this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course
outcome addressed in this module.
Timeliness of
Postings
3
20%
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made
before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT.
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
2
Total
15
100%
A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above
requirements.
GRADING RUBRIC
Reflection
Criteria
Met
Not Met
Reflection 1
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and describes
what the student hopes to learn during this
module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly
describe what the student hopes to learn during
this module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
1.
Reflection 2
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a
minimum of one course outcome
addressed in this module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet
one or both of the following criteria.
• Describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module.
• Connects learning achieved to a minimum
of one course outcome addressed in this
module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
2.
Timeliness of
Postings
3 Points
0 Points
The following expectations for timely postings
are met:
One or more of the following expectations for
timely postings are not met:
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
AND
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
0 Points Deducted
Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced
by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3 Points Deducted
One or more errors is present in any of the
following areas.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Grammar
Spelling
Word usage
Punctuation
Sentence structure
Paragraph structure
4
Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Collaboration Café Guidelines and
Grading Rubric
Purpose
In specific weeks of the course, you will have the opportunity to collaborate with your classmates in the Collaboration Café for a
graded assignment. The point value of the weekly assignment can be worth either 30 or 50 points, and the point value will be
identified on each assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive process among the students. Faculty participation will be
minimal; however, faculty will monitor this section for compliance and clarification.
Due Date
•
The suggested due date for the primary and responsive postings is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of the week that corresponds
with the module (e.g., Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2 for the Collaboration Café in Module 2).
•
All Collaboration Cafés must be submitted by Monday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Module 8 with the exception of the Module 8
Collaboration Café. The due date for Module 8 is Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Total Points Possible: 50 points (30 points for some instances)
Requirements
In the graded Collaboration Café, students are expected to post their initial response and then interact with at least two different
classmates during that module for a total of three postings per Collaboration Café worth 50 points, and two postings per
Collaboration Café worth 30 points.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference,
APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these,
you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism. In addition, proper grammar is expected. Faculty may
submit the discussion to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments
toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week.
A substantive post will include the following.
• Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner
• Demonstrates application of course concepts
• Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice
• Responds to classmates with an extended description instead of merely agreeing
GRADING RUBRIC
Category
Points
%
Description
Discussion content
•
25 (12)*
25%
Response to peers
15 (8)*
15%
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
•
•
Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive
manner
Demonstrates application of course concepts
Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice
•
•
•
Includes substantive content that poses new ideas
Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue
Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner
Chamberlain University
APA, grammar, spelling, syntax,
and organizational flow
Collaboration Café Rubric
5
5%
Participation requirement
5
Total
50 (30)*
5%
100%
•
APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow of the content reflects
professional standards
•
•
Primary posting in response to the questions posed is present
Minimum of two responsive posts to peers. When the Collaboration Café is
worth 30 points, only one responsive post to a peer is required.
A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements.
*A score in parenthesis represents the 30 point scale.
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment
Criteria
Outstanding level of
performance
100%
Satisfactory level of
performance
86%
Deficient level of performance
68%
Unsatisfactory level of
performance
0%
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
25
12
22
10
17
8
0
Discussion
content
Presentation of information
includes all of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes two of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Presentation of information
includes one of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes none of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Chamberlain University
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of
the topic to a specific
practice area
Collaboration Café Rubric
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of
the topic to a specific
practice area
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
15
8
13
7
8
5
0
Response to
peers
Presentation of information
includes all of the following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that
prompt additional
dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes at least two of the
following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that prompt
additional dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes at least one of the
following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that prompt
additional dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes none of the following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that
prompt additional
dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful
and constructive manner
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
5
4
3
0
APA, grammar,
and syntax
There are no errors in the posts.
There are 1-2 errors in the posts.
There are 3-4 errors in the posts.
There are 5 or more errors in the
posts.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Chamberlain University
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
5
Student answers the question or topic on one day and interacts with at
least two other classmates in a particular module for the week.
In the 30-point rubric, the student interacts with at least one other
classmate in a particular module for the week.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Collaboration Café Rubric
0
Student did not meet this requirement.
NR528 Module 5: Collaboration Café (graded)
DUE 11/26/2022
Perform a mini SWOT analysis on the organization where you are planning your change
project. How does the SWOT analysis set the stage for strategic planning, especially in
regards to change? Make sure to place your mini SWOT here in the Collaboration Café
space.
NR528 Module 5: Reflection: Part 2 (graded)
DUE 11/26/2022
Based on your response to Reflection: Part 1, state one insight that you gained regarding
the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course
outcome addressed during this module.
Course Outcomes
CO 2: Determine the need for planned change that improves health and
organizational outcomes based on a comprehensive needs assessment. (POs 4
and 5)
• CO 3: Create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative
in order to promote practice-related outcomes. (POs 4 and 5)
•
Module Objectives
Examine the value of the strategic planning process to organizations. (COs 2 and
3)
• Discuss the SWOT analysis in the strategic planning process. (COs 2 and 3)
• Explore how the strategic planning process can assist with implementing QI and
EBP change initiatives. (COs 2 and 3)
•
THIS IS WHAT I POSTED IN PART 1
In this module, I hope to learn:
•
•
How to determine the need for planned change that improves health and organizational
outcomes based on a comprehensive needs assessment.
How to create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative in order
to promote practice-related outcomes.
NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING
Module 4 Assignment:
Literature Matrix and
Synthesis
Guidelines and
Rubric
DUE 11/19/2022
PURPOSE
As a master’s-prepared advance practice nurse you will have many opportunities to lead evidence-based
change in practice. The deliverable at the end of this program is a completed evidence-based process
improvement project prepared for dissemination. The beginning steps of developing an evidence-based
practice improvement project include creating a clinical or practice question and searching literature. The
purpose of this assessment is to use the clinical or practice question developed in NR520 and conduct a
literature search for articles that answer and/or explain the clinical or practice question. Students will
conduct a literature search in relevant databases and complete a literature matrix table. Students will also
provide a short summary synthesizing their evidence.
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes:
•
•
•
CO 1: Apply leadership and management theories, concepts, and models as a foundation for
planned change within healthcare delivery settings. (PO 4,5)
CO 2: Determine the need for planned change that improves health and organizational outcomes
based on a comprehensive needs assessment (PO 4,5)
CO 3: Create a plan to lead and evaluate an evidence-informed change initiative in order to
promote practice-related outcomes (PO 4,5)
SUGGESTED DUE DATE
This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 4.
Final due date is Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 7.
NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 180 POINTS
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
For this assignment, students will use the clinical or practice question developed in NR520 and conduct a
literature search for articles that answer and/or explain the clinical or practice question. Students will
conduct a literature search in relevant databases and complete a literature matrix table. Students will also
provide a short summary synthesizing their evidence.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
1. Review clinical/practice question developed in NR520. You might choose to modify or change the
clinical/practice question.
2. Conduct a literature search in databases appropriate for the identified clinical/practice question.
3. Select ten (10) scholarly articles published within the past five years.
4. Complete the Literature Matrix Table
5. In a summary, synthesize your findings from the reviewed evidence and include in Part II of the
Literature Matrix.
6. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
7. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
8. Written portions of this assignment must use appropriate citation of sources, and references must
follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.
9. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are
followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition).
10. Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can resubmit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You
have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make
improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All
revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your
APA for a higher grade in that category)
ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Assessment
Criteria
Part I of the
Literature
Matrix Table
Points
%
85
47
Description
Complete the Literature Matrix Table. All columns
are completed. Ten (10) articles are provided.
Articles selected address or answer the
clinical/practice question. Articles selected are
scholarly and published within the past five years.
NR 528: LEADING AND MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED CHANGE IN NURSING
Part II
Synthesis of
Evidence
85
47
Summary and synthesis of findings is included on
the form addressing how the articles answered
the EBP question.
Graduate-level
Writing Style
10
6
•
•
•
•
•
Total
180
100%
Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation,
sentence and paragraph structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas
within writing
Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of
first person
Synthesis of information is present with no more
than one short direct quote (15 words or less)
Correct APA format for the following:
o Font style and size
o Margins and spacing
o Headings; subheadings
o Citation and referencing sources
o Mechanics of style (abbreviations,
capitalization, italics, numbers)
A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above
requirements.
NR 528: LEADING AND
MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED
CHANGE IN NURSING
GRADING RUBRIC
Assessment
Criteria
Part I of the
Literature
Matrix Table
Distinguished
Exceeds
Proficient
Needs Improvement
(100%)
(92%)
(84%)
(0)
85 Points
78 Points
71 Points
0 Points
Distinguished presentation of
information evidenced by all of
the following content areas
covered in a comprehensive
and concise manner:
• Completes all columns of
the Literature Matrix Table
• Provides ten (10) articles
• Articles are scholarly and
published within the past
five years
• Articles address or answer
clinical/practice question
Presentation of
information exceeds
expectations evidenced
by most content covered
in a comprehensive and
concise manner, but with
one area where coverage
is superficial:
• Completes all columns of
the Literature Matrix Table
• Provides ten (10) articles
• Articles are scholarly and
published within the past
five years
• Articles address or answer
clinical/practice question
Proficient presentation of
information evidenced by
content covered in a limited
or superficial manner in two
or more of the content areas:
• Completes all columns of
the Literature Matrix
Table
• Provides ten (10) articles
• Articles are scholarly and
published within the past
five years
• Articles address or answer
clinical/practice question
Presentation of information
needs improvement as
evidenced by content that is
missing or unsatisfactory in one
or more of the content areas:
• Completes all columns of
the Literature Matrix Table
• Provides ten (10) articles
• Articles are scholarly and
published within the past
five years
• Articles address or answer
clinical/practice question
4
NR 528: LEADING AND
MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED
CHANGE IN NURSING
Part II
Synthesis of
Evidence
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
85 Points
78 Points
71 Points
0 Points
Distinguished presentation of
information evidenced by all of
the following content areas
covered in a comprehensive
and concise manner:
• Assesses and
assimilates
consistencies in
findings
• At least two-three
paragraphs of
information is
presented
• Addresses how articles
answered the EBP
question.
• Synthesis is thorough
and presented in at
least two-three
paragraphs.
Presentation of
information exceeds
expectations evidenced
by most content covered
in a comprehensive and
concise manner, but with
one area where coverage
is superficial:
• Assesses and assimilates
consistencies in findings
• At least two-three
paragraphs of
information is
presented
• Addresses how articles
answered the EBP
question.
• Synthesis is thorough
and presented in at
least two-three
paragraphs.
Proficient presentation of
information evidenced by
content covered in a limited
or superficial manner in two
or more of the content areas:
• Assesses and
assimilates
consistencies in
findings
• At least two-three
paragraphs of
information is
presented
• Addresses how
articles answered the
EBP question.
• Synthesis is thorough
and presented in at
least two-three
paragraphs.
Presentation of information
needs improvement as
evidenced by content that is
missing or unsatisfactory in one
or more of the content areas:
• Assesses and assimilates
consistencies in findings
• At least two-three
paragraphs of
information is
presented
• Addresses how articles
answered the EBP
question.
• Synthesis is thorough
and presented in at
least two-three
paragraphs.
10 Points
9 Points
8 Points
0 Points
Distinguished graduate-level
writing style is evidenced by
Graduate-level writing style
exceeds expectations as
evidenced by meeting the
Proficient graduate-level
writing style is evidenced by
meeting the following
Graduate-level writing style
needs improvement as
evidenced by meeting the
5
NR 528: LEADING AND
MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED
CHANGE IN NURSING
meeting all of the following
criteria with 0-1 errors total:
• Correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation,
sentence and paragraph
structure
• Clarity, organization, and
logical flow of ideas within
writing
• Scholarly, professional
writing tone with no use of
first person
• Synthesis of information is
present with no more than
one short direct quote (15
words or less)
• Correct APA format for the
following:
o Font style and size
o Margins and spacing
o Headings; subheadings
o Citation and referencing
sources
o Mechanics of style
(abbreviations,
capitalization, italics,
numbers)
following criteria with 2-4
errors total:
• Correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation,
sentence and paragraph
structure
• Clarity, organization, and
logical flow of ideas within
writing
• Scholarly, professional
writing tone with no use of
first person
• Synthesis of information is
present with no more than
one short direct quote (15
words or less)
• Correct APA format for the
following:
o Font style and size
o Margins and spacing
o Headings; subheadings
o Citation and referencing
sources
o Mechanics of style
(abbreviations,
capitalization, italics,
numbers)
criteria with 5-7 errors,
total:
• Correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation,
sentence and paragraph
structure
• Clarity, organization, and
logical flow of ideas within
writing
• Scholarly, professional
writing tone with no use of
first person
• Synthesis of information is
present with no more than
one short direct quote (15
words or less)
• Correct APA format for the
following:
o Font style and size
o Margins and spacing
o Headings; subheadings
o Citation and
referencing sources
o Mechanics of style
(abbreviations,
capitalization, italics,
numbers)
following criteria with 8 or
more errors, total:
• Correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation,
sentence and paragraph
structure
• Clarity, organization, and
logical flow of ideas within
writing
• Scholarly, professional
writing tone with no use of
first person
• Synthesis of information is
present with no more than
one short direct quote (15
words or less)
• Correct APA format for the
following:
o Font style and size
o Margins and spacing
o Headings; subheadings
o Citation and referencing
sources
o Mechanics of style
(abbreviations,
capitalization, italics,
numbers)
6
NR 528: LEADING AND
MANAGING EVIDENCE-BASED
CHANGE IN NURSING
7

Get your paper done on time by an expert in your field.

Order Now