OL 211 SNHU Human Resource Management Paper

OL 211 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and RubricOverview: This milestone is designed to begin a critical analysis applying knowledge gained within the course. This short paper assignment is the first step in the
analysis of the company that will become your final project. For the final project, you will review the human resource management (HRM) in an organization
through a real scenario. This case study will give you the opportunity to explore various roles and processes within the human resources profession. A key skill for
any professional working in human resources is the ability to develop and implement processes that align with a company’s strategic plan and mission.
Begin by reading the first 13 pages of the case study, A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: Evaluating Strategic Talent Management Initiatives (up to HR-Customer Initiative
at Maersk), located in your Harvard Business Review Coursepack.
Start your short paper by briefly answering the following questions:
1. Explain why the human resource function should be aligned with an organization’s strategic plan (use ideas from the Module One discussion on this
topic).
2. Explain how current global conditions in Maersk’s industry impact human resource management practices within this organization (use ideas from the
Module One discussion on this topic).
Then, using the material on recruitment strategies provided in this week’s lesson and the case study, address the following:
1. Compare and contrast recruitment and selection of internal versus external candidates in general.
2. Describe how Maersk has recruited and selected new employees who were aligned with the organization’s vision and goals over the years.
3. Assess the effectiveness of its recruitment process and determine what changes if any you would recommend to improve employee success and
retention.
Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be 2–3 pages in length and double-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font. Be sure to list your
references at the end of your paper.
Rubric
Critical Elements
HRM Functions
and Practices:
Function
Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation is supported with
evidence
Proficient (85%)
Explains why the human
resource function should be
aligned with an organization’s
strategic plan
HRM Functions
and Practices:
Global Conditions
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation is clear and detailed
Explains how current global
conditions in the industry impact
human resource management
practices within organizations
Staffing: Recruit
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of the
relationship between recruiting
and the organization’s vision and
goals
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
establishes which method would
be more beneficial for an
organization based on the
research
Describes a process to recruit
and select new employees who
are aligned with the
organization’s vision and goals
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional
and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Staffing:
Candidates
Articulation of
Response
Compares and contrasts
recruitment and selection of
internal versus external
candidates using the Society for
Human Resource Management
website as a resource
Needs Improvement (55%)
Explains why the human
resource function should be
aligned with an organization’s
strategic plan, but explanation is
cursory or inaccurate
Explains how current global
conditions in the industry impact
human resource management
practices within organizations,
but explanation is cursory or has
gaps in accuracy
Describes a process to recruit
and select new employees who
are aligned with the
organization’s vision and goals,
but description is cursory or
inaccurate
Compares and contrasts
recruitment and selection of
internal versus external
candidates but does not utilize
the Society for Human Resource
Management website as a
resource
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Not Evident (0%)
Does not explain why the human
resource function should be
aligned with an organization’s
strategic plan
Value
23
Does not explain how current
global conditions impact human
resource management practices
within organizations
23
Does not describe a process to
recruit and select new
employees who are aligned with
the organization’s vision and
goals
23
Does not compare and contrast
recruitment and selection of
internal versus external
candidates using the Society for
Human Resource Management
website as a resource
23
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
Total
8
100%