The First Amendment guarantees religious liberty. It allows observance of one’s religious faith and practices without government interference Jahn (2017). In the First Amendment, we have the Establishment Clause that prohibits the government from endorsing any religion, and this has important effects on religious observance in public schools. As thus, school teachers and management in public schools are thus effectively barred from;
The above restrictions do not effectively imply that religion should not be taught. Religious books are constitutionally allowed for the study of history, ethics, civilization of man, and comparative religion among others as seen in Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39, 42 (1980). The tenets of religion can be used to evaluate history, literature, astronomy, and sciences among other disciplines. The idea is to use religion to promote education and not using religion to promote or inhibit religious beliefs.
Religion is a particularly complex issues that extends to different elements or operations of the schools. Prayer and Bible-reading is legally wrong in school as evidenced in Engel v. Vitale (1962) and School Dist. V. Schempp (1963) and this extends to meditation or moments of silence. Student led prayers are illegal since they seem as endorsement of religion at official capacities as seen in Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe (2000). Student led prayers, even in school activities and competitions such as football games is illegal. Displaying religious messages in schools, for instance, the ten commandments is illegal as evidenced in Stone v. Graham (1980), however, displaying religious symbols and graphics is allowed as long as such symbols and graphics are of educational relevance.
Abington School Dist. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L. Ed. 2d 844 (1963).
Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, 82 S. Ct. 1261, 8 L. Ed. 2d 601 (1962).
Jahn, S. J. (2017). Religious Diversity. Philosophical and Political Dimensions. Entangled Religions, 4, 45-53.
Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 120 S. Ct. 2266, 147 L. Ed. 2d 295 (2000).Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39, 101 S. Ct. 192, 66 L. Ed. 2d 199 (1980).
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more