An arrest warrant is issued to permit the law enforcement authorities to recognize and locate an individual who is required to be arrested. This is often an individual who previously had been arrested, freed on bail, however failed to reappear in court following their release. This is usually a very precise warrant, which applies solely to a single individual (Blackstock & Justice (Society), 2012). On the contrary, a search warrant permits the law enforcement personnel to enter a premise for instance a residence, a piece of land or a building, to carry out a search for evidence, which may be utilized in an upcoming trial. The premise to be searched or materials to be seized ought to be listed precisely on the search warrant. Additional differences are:
An arrest warrant apart from containing the signature of the judge or magistrate has a number of essential components to make it an actionable document
A search warrant should contain the signature from a judge or magistrate to make it valid in addition, it should comprise:
Probable cause for an arrest warrant is not particularly compound. The officer making an application for the arrest warrant should simply offer probable cause indicating that the individual to be arrested performed the offense in question. During the application the officer is never necessitated to indicate the suspect is at a specific location. Whereas, probable cause regarding a search warrant is twofold: firstly, making an application for the search warrant is required to indicate the probable cause showing that the materials to be acquired are linked with criminal activities (Siegel & Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction, 2008). Secondly, the officer is required to indicate probable cause showing that the materials to be acquired are positioned at the location to be searched.
A search warrant requires probable cause positioning the items to be acquired at a particular location since searching an individual’s property motivated by hearsay amounts to trespassing and the individual might sue (Hall, 2013). Additionally, illegal searches may invoke the fourth amendment rights of the owner of the property. Whereas an arrest warrant does not require probable cause positioning an individual at a particular location since people are mobile and they might be found at different locations at any one particular time.
References
Blackstock, J., & Justice (Society). (2012). European arrest warrants: Ensuring an effective defence. London: JUSTICE.
Hall, J. W. (2013). Search and seizure.
Siegel, D. M., & Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction. (2008). Searches and seizures with a warrant: Issuance of the warrant 1. (CALI: The Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more