The recently concluded and controversial American Presidential elections, has aroused a heated debated of the alleged interference by Russian agents. The yet to be substantiated allegations have aroused the interests of both the local and foreign media power houses – with each reporting the same issue albeit using a different coverage and analytical methodology. Never before in the American political history has an election aroused suspicion of such magnitude. . In fact, the issue has raised the ambivalence between self-preservation and fact-finding – making it more and more twisted. As such, this paper aims at analyzing the various approaches used to address the issue by various media houses. Although media houses uses different approaches to report and analyze the Russian meddling allegations, a scrutiny of the content, style, and discourse will always conflate to the same point.
On the other hand, the New York times seems to be more critical of the administration. The powerful media house uses very strong words that evoke the interests of the reader into the possibility that the allegations could be very true. For instance, when describing one of the potentially crucial witnesses in the mêlée, the news agency describes her as having close ties to a powerful Russian oligarch. The emphasis of the power of the oligarch elicits the possibility of the Russian’s having the power to meddle with the US elections. The reporting over emphasizes the presence of close ties and connections within the powers that be; and people who it seems to insinuate that are capable of doing a thing or two that can interfere with the domestic affairs of the United States. Nonetheless, the New York Times report is also quick to point out that the potential informant is “prominent on social media and is considered by some to be a publicity seeker” (Paddock). It is apparent that the media is cautious lest it gives an overly conclusive coverage that it cannot substantiate.
Therefore, it is imperative to note that various news outlets and analysts use different approaches to address an issue. The style of that the author uses is very significant in the discourse as it helps established the potential and target audience. An author may choose to use various rhetoric appeals that may evoke the audiences’ emotions and interests. For instance, Paddock’s use of the term powerful, and his persistent emphasis on the mentioned parties’ financial capability, shows influence. The powerful billionaires and oligarchs mentioned in the article gives the clue of a potential possibility of the powers to have an influence over the United States presidential elections. On the other hand, Coaston and Siddiqui uses a comparative approach wherein they compare the Trump’s administration and the Obama’s administration. That happens to be an interesting twist of the events which seems to not only shift the blames, but also sanitize the role of Trump in the alleged meddle. Coaston and Siddiqui uses a different narrative that tries to exonerate Trump albeit indirectly, whereas Paddock uses an appeal that subtly implies the possibilities of the Russian interference.
Besides, the three articles juxtaposes the allegations of the Russian meddling with the United States presidential elections using different approaches. The narrative construct of the three authors evokes different appeals. Coaston, for instance, illustrates that the Trumps administration was caught off guard by the hacking events. Perhaps, the use of the term is intentionally used to convey a subtle meaning. The diction is possibly meant not to show the unpreparedness of the administration but its non-involvement. The fact that the Trump’s administration was caught unawareness shows that they had nothing to blame in the alleged meddling. Consequently, that befits the narrative that it is Obama who was to blame for recklessness in the whole saga. It is strategically escapist. On the other hand, Saddiqui, who seems to be a proponent of the innocence of the Trump’s administration uses a different appeal but conveys the same message. Ideally, the appeal of the author will always reveal his or her stance.
In summation, different authors will convey the same message using different constructions. The narratives will at times end up conveying the same message, yet the authors will exude their biases. In fact, the style and the discourse will always determine the partiality of an author or the lack thereof. The issue of the Russian alleged meddling with the United States presidential elections has been a heated and controversial debate – in not only the US, but over the world. Author, analysts, and pundits have given varied perspectives about the issue. Essentially, the reporting of the same has been revolving around the issue of self-preservation and fact-finding. Either way, the authors have maintained their biases in their works – but the significance of the topic remains relevant.
Coaston, Jane. “Trump’S New “Blame Obama” Approach To Russian Election Meddling, Explained.” Vox. N.p., 2018. Web. 6 Mar. 2018. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/22/17025628/trumps-obama-russia-scandal-white-house
Paddock, Richard. “Escort Says Audio Recordings Show Russian Meddling In U.S. Election.” Nytimes.com. N.p., 2018. Web. 6 Mar. 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/world/asia/nastya-rybka-trump-putin.html
Siddiqui, Sabrina. “NSA Chief: Trump ‘Has Not Ordered Disruption Of Russia Election Meddling’.” the Guardian. N.p., 2018. Web. 6 Mar. 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/27/trump-russia-meddling-mike-rogers
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more