“Whose culture is it”

 The paragraph introduces the author and aspect of culture treasures and illegal trading of the treasures

THESIS: An artifact should not be regarded to hold to those specific nationals but as a contribution to the global cultural heritage

It is the worth of cultural property or artifact to people and not the world population that matters.

Background 

1. The author introduces different instances of illegal handling of artifacts
2. Several incidents of pillage and plunder of artifacts
3. Argument for the scandal continuation even after ending of European empires

1. Digging of sculptures in Mali 
2. Illegal smuggling of Nigerian artifacts 
3. Argument for the protest and laws to regulate cultural partrimony

1. Cultural partrimony as cultural artifact 
2. Cultural partrimony as cultural product
3. Argument for biological descent as a distraction 

1. Government should conserve things that hold cultural value
2. Sculptures as potential value to humanity
3. Argument that it is the value of the thing to the people that matters rather than the people themselves

1. Artifact is a representation of contribution of worldwide heritage
2. Notion of origination is elastic

Vii. Argument for partrimony being equal to imperialism accompanied by time

1. Use of legal argument to determine what should happen to something of value to people

Viii. Conclusion

If something hold a status as a worthwhile contribution to global culture, the policy ought to be one that safeguard that thing and makes it accessible to individuals who will gain from experiencing it.